So...we provide transportation from the middle of Africa; launch money plus a ninety day stipend; the usual suite of school and social services; a jail cell for those who get caught...I wonder if firearms are provided?
Alas, Americans no longer read newspapers but if they did they would find no generalizations about race. Places like HuffPost are perfectly liberal but for their inclusion of photos that identify NAMS offenders. Stars like Steve Sailer remain hidden in the shadows. Still, the Bloggosphere is our only window of expression.
Insanity is paying troubled Africans and Mexicans to move freely into America regardless of IQ or educational background or criminal tendencies. Human trash by any other name is still trash. We are currently engaged in a supremely expensive project to remake our lowest NAMS students into Harvard's favorite sons.Bill Gates, a very smart man at certain tasks, believes that HBD is untrue, Darwin was wrong, and silk purses come from Sows' ears! This is the age of egalitarian madness just as modern science fully disclosed the truth of Darwinian evolution and human inequality. Bruce Lahn ran away, but others like Henry Harpending remain to face the cult of liberalism. Even U. of Wisconsin built a new Institute in honor the James F. Crow, the Father of American genetics, who happens to agree with HBD. Our PC culture is a morass of political and social confusion as square pegs MUST fit round holes. Will we be an intact nation in this maelstom?
I also do not believe that it is a case of our evil overlords doing this to us, rather the "system" is flexible enough that almost anything can happen, and it did and our evil overlords do not really care, as long as their nests are adequately feathered and they have their gold squirreled away where they can get it when they have to bolt.
When Germany wanted pass through Belgium in order to attack France at the start of the Great War, King Albert I of Belgium retorted, "Belgium is a nation, not a road." We now need a leader to say, "America is a nation, not a refugee camp."
Dennis, I don't like to throw cold water on any comfort you derive from the comments to the article, but does it really matter that more people understand the soft genocide of African refugee resettlement? Government agencies couldn't care less. The unelected bureaucrats in the aid industry don't give a flying flip how their dive bombing of neighborhoods upsets the residents. If they take any notice at all, that's just proof of how racist the country is.
No candidate for office -- state, local, or federal -- would dream of decrying this use of refugees to further weaken the white middle class ... even though it would win them votes and possibly an election. That's how deeply scared public figures are of being called racist. They'd rather be defeated.
The government's grip may for the moment be less overtly violent than it was in the Soviet Union, but it is just as ideologically rigid and effective.
Belgium is actually more of an artificial political construct than an organic nation. There has been a divide between the two major groups there, the Dutch speaking Flemish and the French speaking Walloons. Flanders is prosperous, while Walloon is relatively economically depressed. There are no national political parties or newspapers, radio or TV stations. The former Prime Minister and current leader of the Christian Democratic and Flemish party, Yves Leterme, has said it is only the king, a love of beers and the football team that unites Belgians and views the country as "an accident of history".
The possible dissolution of Belgium with Flanders and Walloon either becoming independent or joining the Netherlands and France, respectively, is still an issue.
Rick, The hope here is that the anger of the public will reach critical mass, creating what Lenin would call a 'pre-revolutionary condition'. That's the only way the national question is likely to be satisfactorily addressed. Could you see something like Operation Wetback II plus the immigration act of 1925 being put through by the present crop of politicians---even, say, Bachmann? No, you need the public to be angry enough that being identified with the existing order actually becomes hazardous to your social status (and health). Only in such a condition are truly radical changes possible.
Obviously, I hope you're right. But the problem isn't that white people accept population replacement. Surely many don't, and probably the number is growing. But who can they vote for to change the system? They can't elect new bureaucrats. No candidate for office dares utter a peep against the government's campaign, dares even to mention it.
Possibly within the next few years we will have a revolutionary situation. If so, the possibilities for unexpected and unhappy consequences are great.
I have been proclaiming in season and out that we need a constitutional amendment enabling legal and peaceful secession of states. The likely alternative in case of outright rebellion is federal prosecution of secessionist leaders or even occupation of would-be breakaway states, similar to the so-called Reconstruction following the Northern War of 1861-65 (when a demented U.S. president and fanatical abolitionists were willing to sacrifice 600,000 lives for a political abstraction called the Union).
Sorry, it really pains me to be so pessimistic, but there is always hope that some unforeseen development will be a game changer. "If you can look into the seeds of time,/ and say which grain will grow and which will not,/ speak then to me ... "
When I submit a problem to my non-conscious mind -- intentionally or not -- it almost invariably supplies further insight.
This time, it says I am ignoring a middle step: Three distinct changes must arise in the white population. Dislike of forced immigration comes first. Necessary, but not sufficient. This stage has often been reached. Second, recognition that population replacement isn't just more silly business of the sort all governments are prone to -- it's deadly serious, slow-motion genocide. Only a small wodge of the population has attained this stage, but the recognition is growing. I think that is what Dennis sees, and I was too negative in dismissing it. Third, active (not violent) rebellion. Very sparse at the moment, but it cannot become widespread until the first two conditions are in place.
Rebellion is dangerous and I am not on any account advocating armed revolution, which is an engraved invitation to overwhelming suppression. As suggested, we need a clear path to peaceful and legal secession.
Rick, As anger mounts lots of things start happening. Ordinary people start doing who...whom jury nullification. They start taking a casual attitude towards violating federal edicts. This escalates the situation. Then something happens like an outraged husband or father punching out a TSA screener (I covered an assault on a TSA agent on my blog some months back, the Arizona authorities decided not to charge her), and the jury returns an innocent verdict based on who...whom. That's when things have a chance to go nonlinear. As reactionaries, our task is to assist the system in destroying its own legitimacy. Political actions that are unthinkable outside a prerevolutionary condition become feasible, even favored. Expect to see ex-post facto suspended in such a case, at least for a while.
Rebellion is dangerous and I am not on any account advocating armed revolution, which is an engraved invitation to overwhelming suppression. As suggested, we need a clear path to peaceful and legal secession.
I have mentioned this several times and I have never had anyone show the least bit of interest. So, at the risk of boring some readers, I will reiterate my support of boycotts.
I still believe a campaign to skip one Christmas season would have devastating results and would require nothing of the participants except for them to refrain from conspicuous consumption.
When gay leaders call for boycotts, how many people participate? Gays are only 2% of the population and only a slight percentage of them ever participate in these boycotts. Given a total population of around 6 million, the numbers actually boycotting are quite small.
When Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton threaten boycotts, the same thing occurs. Yet a tiny percentage of 45 million people is enough to get businesses like Toyota to cave.
Europeans still account for over 200 million people in this nation. So even a small percent would represent a lot of people. There are already the means to communicate such action through churches and online sites.
If the pastors are able to get the sheep to vote the GOP, why couldn't they do the same with this? If Paul supporters are able to rally a couple of million people for moneybombs, why couldn't they do the same with this?
One decent boycott of Christmas would have the rulers shitting themselves.
"I have been proclaiming in season and out that we need a constitutional amendment enabling legal and peaceful secession of states."
Unlikely.
"The likely alternative in case of outright rebellion is federal prosecution of secessionist leaders or even occupation of would-be breakaway states, similar to the so-called Reconstruction following the Northern War of 1861-65 (when a demented U.S. president and fanatical abolitionists were willing to sacrifice 600,000 lives for a political abstraction called the Union)."
Should this occur, I doubt the federal gov't has the ability to win that fight.
Can some of you macroeconomic / fiscally-inclined people explain to me what will happen if the Federal government does the obvious "Keynesian" thing and "reflates". I.e., if the Federal Reserve/government decides to directly increase the money supply and cover its shortfalls with new cash, and furthermore to reduce the real value of its debt (and everyone else's)?
Obviously it causes problems, but I'm not sure if it helps much even in a narrow sense. Inflation will kick up both Social Security COLAs and drug prices, which will increase the entitlement spending that Congress can't reduce (because Congress has no power over Federal statutes! you silly!) We're talking about discretionary spending already being cut, right? So inflation only reduces real government outlays in a few areas (welfare, I suppose meaning TANF and some others?)
Inflation will bracket-creep some more middle class taxpayers into the all-important "rich" category (soak 'em!). So that will bring in some more dollars. Some folks will drop out of the job market, of course, taking the teeth out of any gains here.
Debts will lose real value, but interest rates will soar. This means new bond issues will hurt future taxpayers more, and old bonds (at reasonable rates) will lose value.
People on fixed-rate mortgages have a little silver lining, no?
What I'm really wondering maybe noöne can answer: is there a reason for Federal law enforcement people to keep showing up to work if their real wages are plummeting? Or perhaps will Congress have the will to radically hike the money wages of Federal LEOs while everyone else is getting the shaft? Military people can't leave (although they can stop reënlisting), but losing good FBI / DHS / Treasury people, and of course the Marshals who are supposed to enforce court orders (e.g., against secession, perhaps?) would probably cripple the blatantly illegitimate joiks in Washington.
Things will be SO MUCH different - different from violent chaos - if state governments retain legitimacy and control over some LEOs. If DC went away the states could save American civilization on their own. They have borders, police, civil defense forces, tax collectors, judges, the whole business. This is why I have an iota of hope.
Looking at the picture from the Huffington Post article, where does the "refugee" on the right get the money for that jacket? I used to live in a majority black city, and somehow most of them manage to wear the hottest (to black people) expensive threads and carry the latest cell phones and gadgets. Meanwhile, awash in "white privilege," I wear a 12 year old LL Bean jacket and carry a 7 year old bottom of the line cell phone.
Dude must be an undocumented pharmacist or something.
Please post a civil and intelligent comment, preferably using a screen name other than "anonymous". Comments are not currently moderated and their publication does not imply the agreement of the blog's author.
So...we provide transportation from the middle of Africa; launch money plus a ninety day stipend; the usual suite of school and social services; a jail cell for those who get caught...I wonder if firearms are provided?
ReplyDeleteGood catch Dennis. The entire comment thread is pretty enlightening. Interesting times.
ReplyDeleteSudanese Refugees in Omaha Wrestle With Rise of Street Gangs
Alas, Americans no longer read newspapers but if they did they would find no generalizations about race. Places like HuffPost are perfectly liberal but for their inclusion of photos that identify NAMS offenders. Stars like Steve Sailer remain hidden in the shadows. Still, the Bloggosphere is our only window of expression.
ReplyDeleteInsanity is paying troubled Africans and Mexicans to move freely into America regardless of IQ or educational background or criminal tendencies. Human trash by any other name is still trash. We are currently engaged in a supremely expensive project to remake our lowest NAMS students into Harvard's favorite sons.Bill Gates, a very smart man at certain tasks, believes that HBD is untrue, Darwin was wrong, and silk purses come from Sows' ears! This is the age of egalitarian madness just as modern science fully disclosed the truth of Darwinian evolution and human inequality. Bruce Lahn ran away, but others like Henry Harpending remain to face the cult of liberalism. Even U. of Wisconsin built a new Institute in honor the James F. Crow, the Father of American genetics, who happens to agree with HBD. Our PC culture is a morass of political and social confusion as square pegs MUST fit round holes. Will we be an intact nation in this maelstom?
Too little too late.
ReplyDeleteI also do not believe that it is a case of our evil overlords doing this to us, rather the "system" is flexible enough that almost anything can happen, and it did and our evil overlords do not really care, as long as their nests are adequately feathered and they have their gold squirreled away where they can get it when they have to bolt.
I think Chittum is correct.
When Germany wanted pass through Belgium in order to attack France at the start of the Great War, King Albert I of Belgium retorted, "Belgium is a nation, not a road." We now need a leader to say, "America is a nation, not a refugee camp."
ReplyDeleteIf they were being honest, the title of that article would be "Sudanese refugees form street gangs."
ReplyDeleteDennis, I don't like to throw cold water on any comfort you derive from the comments to the article, but does it really matter that more people understand the soft genocide of African refugee resettlement? Government agencies couldn't care less. The unelected bureaucrats in the aid industry don't give a flying flip how their dive bombing of neighborhoods upsets the residents. If they take any notice at all, that's just proof of how racist the country is.
ReplyDeleteNo candidate for office -- state, local, or federal -- would dream of decrying this use of refugees to further weaken the white middle class ... even though it would win them votes and possibly an election. That's how deeply scared public figures are of being called racist. They'd rather be defeated.
The government's grip may for the moment be less overtly violent than it was in the Soviet Union, but it is just as ideologically rigid and effective.
"Belgium is a nation, not a road."
ReplyDeleteBelgium is actually more of an artificial political construct than an organic nation. There has been a divide between the two major groups there, the Dutch speaking Flemish and the French speaking Walloons. Flanders is prosperous, while Walloon is relatively economically depressed. There are no national political parties or newspapers, radio or TV stations. The former Prime Minister and current leader of the Christian Democratic and Flemish party, Yves Leterme, has said it is only the king, a love of beers and the football team that unites Belgians and views the country as "an accident of history".
The possible dissolution of Belgium with Flanders and Walloon either becoming independent or joining the Netherlands and France, respectively, is still an issue.
Don't forget cycling in Belgium.
ReplyDeleteMDR
Rick,
ReplyDeleteThe hope here is that the anger of the public will reach critical mass, creating what Lenin would call a 'pre-revolutionary condition'. That's the only way the national question is likely to be satisfactorily addressed. Could you see something like Operation Wetback II plus the immigration act of 1925 being put through by the present crop of politicians---even, say, Bachmann?
No, you need the public to be angry enough that being identified with the existing order actually becomes hazardous to your social status (and health). Only in such a condition are truly radical changes possible.
According to Tim Wise immigrants ssabilize communities because of the familkail culture.
ReplyDeleteOnly after contact with white "culture" do they turn criminal
Jehu,
ReplyDeleteObviously, I hope you're right. But the problem isn't that white people accept population replacement. Surely many don't, and probably the number is growing. But who can they vote for to change the system? They can't elect new bureaucrats. No candidate for office dares utter a peep against the government's campaign, dares even to mention it.
Possibly within the next few years we will have a revolutionary situation. If so, the possibilities for unexpected and unhappy consequences are great.
I have been proclaiming in season and out that we need a constitutional amendment enabling legal and peaceful secession of states. The likely alternative in case of outright rebellion is federal prosecution of secessionist leaders or even occupation of would-be breakaway states, similar to the so-called Reconstruction following the Northern War of 1861-65 (when a demented U.S. president and fanatical abolitionists were willing to sacrifice 600,000 lives for a political abstraction called the Union).
Sorry, it really pains me to be so pessimistic, but there is always hope that some unforeseen development will be a game changer. "If you can look into the seeds of time,/ and say which grain will grow and which will not,/ speak then to me ... "
Addendum to my comment above.
ReplyDeleteWhen I submit a problem to my non-conscious mind -- intentionally or not -- it almost invariably supplies further insight.
This time, it says I am ignoring a middle step: Three distinct changes must arise in the white population. Dislike of forced immigration comes first. Necessary, but not sufficient. This stage has often been reached. Second, recognition that population replacement isn't just more silly business of the sort all governments are prone to -- it's deadly serious, slow-motion genocide. Only a small wodge of the population has attained this stage, but the recognition is growing. I think that is what Dennis sees, and I was too negative in dismissing it. Third, active (not violent) rebellion. Very sparse at the moment, but it cannot become widespread until the first two conditions are in place.
Rebellion is dangerous and I am not on any account advocating armed revolution, which is an engraved invitation to overwhelming suppression. As suggested, we need a clear path to peaceful and legal secession.
Rick,
ReplyDeleteAs anger mounts lots of things start happening. Ordinary people start doing who...whom jury nullification. They start taking a casual attitude towards violating federal edicts. This escalates the situation. Then something happens like an outraged husband or father punching out a TSA screener (I covered an assault on a TSA agent on my blog some months back, the Arizona authorities decided not to charge her), and the jury returns an innocent verdict based on who...whom. That's when things have a chance to go nonlinear. As reactionaries, our task is to assist the system in destroying its own legitimacy. Political actions that are unthinkable outside a prerevolutionary condition become feasible, even favored. Expect to see ex-post facto suspended in such a case, at least for a while.
Rebellion is dangerous and I am not on any account advocating armed revolution, which is an engraved invitation to overwhelming suppression. As suggested, we need a clear path to peaceful and legal secession.
ReplyDeleteI have mentioned this several times and I have never had anyone show the least bit of interest. So, at the risk of boring some readers, I will reiterate my support of boycotts.
I still believe a campaign to skip one Christmas season would have devastating results and would require nothing of the participants except for them to refrain from conspicuous consumption.
When gay leaders call for boycotts, how many people participate? Gays are only 2% of the population and only a slight percentage of them ever participate in these boycotts. Given a total population of around 6 million, the numbers actually boycotting are quite small.
When Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton threaten boycotts, the same thing occurs. Yet a tiny percentage of 45 million people is enough to get businesses like Toyota to cave.
Europeans still account for over 200 million people in this nation. So even a small percent would represent a lot of people. There are already the means to communicate such action through churches and online sites.
If the pastors are able to get the sheep to vote the GOP, why couldn't they do the same with this? If Paul supporters are able to rally a couple of million people for moneybombs, why couldn't they do the same with this?
One decent boycott of Christmas would have the rulers shitting themselves.
"I have been proclaiming in season and out that we need a constitutional amendment enabling legal and peaceful secession of states."
ReplyDeleteUnlikely.
"The likely alternative in case of outright rebellion is federal prosecution of secessionist leaders or even occupation of would-be breakaway states, similar to the so-called Reconstruction following the Northern War of 1861-65 (when a demented U.S. president and fanatical abolitionists were willing to sacrifice 600,000 lives for a political abstraction called the Union)."
Should this occur, I doubt the federal gov't has the ability to win that fight.
Or the war for that matter...
ReplyDeleteCan some of you macroeconomic / fiscally-inclined people explain to me what will happen if the Federal government does the obvious "Keynesian" thing and "reflates". I.e., if the Federal Reserve/government decides to directly increase the money supply and cover its shortfalls with new cash, and furthermore to reduce the real value of its debt (and everyone else's)?
ReplyDeleteObviously it causes problems, but I'm not sure if it helps much even in a narrow sense. Inflation will kick up both Social Security COLAs and drug prices, which will increase the entitlement spending that Congress can't reduce (because Congress has no power over Federal statutes! you silly!) We're talking about discretionary spending already being cut, right? So inflation only reduces real government outlays in a few areas (welfare, I suppose meaning TANF and some others?)
Inflation will bracket-creep some more middle class taxpayers into the all-important "rich" category (soak 'em!). So that will bring in some more dollars. Some folks will drop out of the job market, of course, taking the teeth out of any gains here.
Debts will lose real value, but interest rates will soar. This means new bond issues will hurt future taxpayers more, and old bonds (at reasonable rates) will lose value.
People on fixed-rate mortgages have a little silver lining, no?
What I'm really wondering maybe noöne can answer: is there a reason for Federal law enforcement people to keep showing up to work if their real wages are plummeting? Or perhaps will Congress have the will to radically hike the money wages of Federal LEOs while everyone else is getting the shaft? Military people can't leave (although they can stop reënlisting), but losing good FBI / DHS / Treasury people, and of course the Marshals who are supposed to enforce court orders (e.g., against secession, perhaps?) would probably cripple the blatantly illegitimate joiks in Washington.
Things will be SO MUCH different - different from violent chaos - if state governments retain legitimacy and control over some LEOs. If DC went away the states could save American civilization on their own. They have borders, police, civil defense forces, tax collectors, judges, the whole business. This is why I have an iota of hope.
Looking at the picture from the Huffington Post article, where does the "refugee" on the right get the money for that jacket? I used to live in a majority black city, and somehow most of them manage to wear the hottest (to black people) expensive threads and carry the latest cell phones and gadgets. Meanwhile, awash in "white privilege," I wear a 12 year old LL Bean jacket and carry a 7 year old bottom of the line cell phone.
ReplyDeleteDude must be an undocumented pharmacist or something.