This story from The Daily Mail was good for a laugh: 'They say I'm a disgusting woman': Military Wives soloist with tattoo on her chest reveals how she's become the victim of cruel internet trolls
A mother who led the Military Wives choir to the top Christmas spot says she has been abused online because of her tattoos.Wait, "you shouldn't judge a book by its cover"? Then why is she having herself defaced with tattoos that everyone within eyeshot can see? Oh... she only wants praise for being such a non-conformist, but no criticism please. See, hipsters are all about making sure everyone knows that they're on the leading edge of trashing public decorum and smashing bourgeois values, but they want only adulation for it. When the bourgeoisie whose values are getting trashed abject to it, the hipsters cry out, "Don't judge me!"
Yesterday's victory was bittersweet for Soloist Samantha Stevenson, 28, who was the victim of a cruel campaign on Facebook and Twitter.
She was branded a 'skank' on internet forums and her tattoos were described as looking like 'temp garish things' that made one Twitter user 'balk'.
But she has vowed to celebrate her chart success by adding a remembrance poppy tattoo to her collection of bright inkings.
'There were loads of nasty comments,' the mother-of-two told The Sun.
'It was hurtful. My tattoos make me stand out from the rest of the girls.
More...
Military Wives are the Christmas number one after selling 556,000 copies in a week
'I've drunk a bottle of wine already!' A jolly Imogen Thomas joins host of celebrities in sharing their Christmas Day snaps
'Most people are lovely and supportive. But I've been really shocked by the reaction to my tattoos by people on the internet.
'They say I'm vile, I'm a disgusting woman with disgusting tattoos and I shouldn't be allowed on TV.
'You shouldn't judge a book by its cover, I am who I am and I like my tattoos. It doesn't make me a bad person. The internet stuff isn't going to put me off.'
We see this phenomenon in everything from OWS to the juggalos. Now, even "military wives" want to be hip and accepted at the same time.
For the record, this woman does indeed look disgusting.
My problem with her tats is that they're really ugly. Tats that I find aesthetically appealing are monochrome, well hidden and arranged in a coherent pattern. For example I like it when it looks like a a solid armband or a bracelet. This chick looks very surprising for a military wife. For a wife at all. She looks like some portland dwelling women's studies graduate student whose thoughts are mostly occupied with heterosexism and cupcakes.
ReplyDeleteYup, she's a skank.
ReplyDeleteAnd in other news, Ron Paul is just crazy, not racist.
I'm so relieved.
Meow...
ReplyDeleteShe is right to be mocked. Tattoos are for trashy people.
ReplyDeleteNotice how the 'dont judge a book by its cover' is used an excuse for poor hygiene and appearance. I cant help by wonder if we 'judged' more maybe there wouldnt be as many obese people or skanky women getting tattoos.
If she were proportionate and not tatted, then she'd be decently attractive.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteMilitary wives? From what I gather the military is pretty much Third World, homos and lesbians. So who is surprised?
Would you care to elaborate on that and provide some statistics?
Attention-seeking behavior does get judged. "My tattoos make me stand out from the rest of the girls." Even as a soloist, she is part of an ensemble and it would have better for the choir had she worn a high neckline and long sleeves. Her husband still would have recognized her.
ReplyDeleteIf he's happy with her tattoos, waistline, lank hair, that's between them.
I don't think I've ever read of a person with tattoos or piercings say, "Yes, I am sending signals; I am making a statement with my appearance, and it's understandable that people judge me on it."
She is noticeable because she is out front as the soloist. She's the soloist because she is the best singer. Good singers tend to be of sturdy physique, (and personality); there is a price to be paid for everything.
ReplyDeleteIt is unreasonable to expect the presentation and looks of a professional. Especially as the children this woman is caring for include an autistic son.
Tattoos can be removed now.
She's not a hipster, she's a chav. Hipsters are likely among those mocking her appearance.
ReplyDeleteThat chick makes Janeane Garafalo look like Grace Kelly.
ReplyDeleteI think Mangan posted a few months back about a jewish australian politician conspiring to get australia to accept a bunch of sudanese refugees who landed in israel. Here's a protest rally from last month in opposition to allowing the sudanese to stay. It's very interesting.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshh0lmJZkXqwZg1r1cJ
Sean68
this woman does indeed look disgusting
ReplyDeleteThat's going too far. She is not pretty but not disgusting either. Perfectly average, I'd say. The tattoos are hideous and make her look worse. More than likely not very smart, too. But the vibe I am getting from here photos is that she is probably a nice, likable person. Hopefully, despite her protests, she learns a lesson from what happened.
She looks like the last dump I took.
ReplyDeleteWhy would a military man risk his life for that? I hope he's getting some good R&R.
ReplyDeleteShe should be forced to wear a burkha. Somebody convert her to Islam now, please.
ReplyDeleteFrom this woman's point of view, I think tattoos of that sort are ugly on both women and men.
ReplyDelete*Insert best Monty Python voice here*
ReplyDelete...and now, Her Majesty's School's Educational Film #193, "How Not to be Thought a Skank".
Step 1 - don't act like a skank.
Step 2 - don't look like a skank.
If in doubt, repeats steps 1 and 2.
She looks like the last dump I took.
ReplyDeleteExcept she's probably nuttier, bloodier, smellier, and louder.
this woman does indeed look disgusting
ReplyDeleteIndeed, and that would be true even without the tattoos.
Very ugly.
ReplyDeleteI don't understand why women insist on getting tattoos. If you really want to engage in some kind of skin body decoration, use henna or body paint. Tattoos are just trashy looking and the attitudes you see expressed defending them are evidence of the tattoo crowd's lack of intelligence.
I think these comments are off-side. She looks British working class, and her husband is probably in uniform, in some hell hole in Afghanistan, holding the line. She looks tough, strong and unselfish. You can be 100% sure the 500 000 plus copies that have been sold of her work, have not been bought by immigrants in the UK.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you, babe, no matter where or what you're tattoo'd.
Anon.
She looks British working class, and her husband is probably in uniform, in some hell hole in Afghanistan, holding the line. She looks tough, strong and unselfish. You can be 100% sure the 500 000 plus copies that have been sold of her work, have not been bought by immigrants in the UK.
ReplyDeleteYeah, trashiness is fine as long as her husband is risking his neck for no reason and foreigners aren't buying her music.
I'm with you, babe, no matter where or what you're tattoo'd.
ReplyDeleteYou sound like a huge faggot.
It is not intelligent to attack your own people.
ReplyDeleteThis is why we keep losing.
Anon.
LOL. You're apparently an idiot as well.
ReplyDeleteEnforcing certain modes of behavior does not constitute an "attack".
Yes, it does, in this case at least. Does it not occur to you that certain people in the UK and elsewhere would want to discredit this woman, and what she stands for-ie, the predominantly white British military?
ReplyDeleteIf I'm an idiot, we're all in trouble.
As to "huge faggot", lol.
Huge, yes, but as to faggot, you're sol.
Anon.
'My tattoos make me stand out from the rest of the girls.'
ReplyDeleteWell there you go...why does she need to stand out if she is already a wife?
Anyone who has spent time amongst these people would understand this woman.
ReplyDeleteLet her be.
Anon.
why does she need to stand out if she is already a wife?
ReplyDeleteWhat's up with all the children in the comments?
Winter break?
Yes, it does, in this case at least.
ReplyDeleteNo, it doesn't.
Does it not occur to you that certain people in the UK and elsewhere would want to discredit this woman, and what she stands for-ie, the predominantly white British military?
Does it not occur to you that certain people in the UK and elsewhere would want to uphold this woman's trashy behavior and associate it with the "predominantly white British military"?
Anyone who has spent time amongst these people would understand this woman.
This isn't about "understanding" anything. This is about being critical of trashy behavior.
I'm with you, babe, no matter where or what you're tattoo'd.
ReplyDeleteIf you were really "with her", then you'd be helping her husband over in Afghanistan, instead of trying to defend her "honor" on the internet to strangers, you coward.
Afghanistan is not where we're losing. We're losing in our own home countries in the West. I've seen it, and lived through it. The front line is now here and the truth is, nowhere is secure.
ReplyDeleteWhat happens is that when the going gets tough, the tough get going; but women like this stick it out, and constitute the main line of defense against barbarity.
This woman is not an intellectual, doesn't pretend to be,and is trying, and succeeding, in doing the right thing for her community.
What is trashy about that?
Anon.
You're attacking a straw man, in typical cowardly fashion.
ReplyDeleteNobody is criticizing her for not being an intellectual, or for doing the "right thing" for "the community". If they were, they'd be criticizing all the other normal looking singing military wives.
What happens is that when the going gets tough, the tough get going; but women like this stick it out, and constitute the main line of defense against barbarity.
You apparently don't understand this quite common English phrase. "Get going" doesn't mean that "the tough" leave, but that they become fully engaged.
"..fully engaged...".
ReplyDeleteI don't think so. Not at all. It means, to spell it out in bricks, that people who talk tough are usually the first to get the hell out when it hits the fan.
Anon.
I don't think so. Not at all. It means, to spell it out in bricks, that people who talk tough are usually the first to get the hell out when it hits the fan.
ReplyDeleteThat's not what it generally means. I don't think you're American or British.
It's called irony. Where I come from, it's an expression that's used a lot. Most people understand it immediately.
ReplyDeleteAnd I am British, and proud of it.
Anon.
It's an American phrase. That's not what it means.
ReplyDeleteHi to all and Merry Christmas and Happy New Year (hopefully).
ReplyDeleteI think choirs should be primarily heard and secondly seen. I do not want judge that.
What's lacking in this analysis, post and comments, is the fact if she is "trash", "bad" and so on, this automatically means these defects reflect on those who have chosen her on her role.
(She remembers me Harry Potter :-) )
She is British, is she not?
ReplyDelete"Britain" just means "land of the tattooed people."
British people are supposed to be marked with blue tattoos. That's how you can tell them apart from Hibernians, Picts, wandering Vikings, etc.
However, some historians claim that their blue markings were just war paint, not permanent tattoos.
These military wives are symbolic of the decline of the west. Traveller is correct, she was chosen to be the lead singer by those who wanted to make this decline apparent. Any tattoo on a woman, visible or not, are a mark of sluttishness and to allow someone with highly apparent ones to appear before the public is a reflection of how sick we are. Similarly, the choir conductor is probably gay, or at least seems very effeminate-hardly a role model for young white men.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore, they are singing on behalf of a bunch of patriotards who are being manipulated by American jewry. Iraq is now turning back into a hellhole (or even worse?) making their efforts utterly pointless. If anything, their presence has probably boosted the Middle Eastern population (due to wider availability of western healthcare), thereby exacerbating the 3rd world immigration problem. The western armies in the middle east have therefore not just accomplished nothing; they have contributed to the decline of the west.
I've no problem with the tattoos but FFS lady grow some thicker skin. You don't get to have them in visible places and then whine when people notice.
ReplyDeleteI don't like the cover. I doubt I would like the book.
ReplyDeleteWow, there must be an influx of new kids today. The level of commentary to this post seldom rises to the "civil and intelligent" standards our host has requested.
ReplyDeleteLook, I don't care for tattoos either, and think that if one must have tattoos, then they should be discreet and easily covered. With that said, however, let me offer a cautious defense of Mrs. Stevenson.
First off, she is Mrs. Stevenson. To wit, she is married. Further, she is a married mother of two. Further still, she is a married mother of two whose husband is an active duty serviceman posted abroad. And judging from the picture of her and one of her children, she's married to a white man. The song she solos on is called "Wherever you are" and is about missing your absent spouse.
That sounds awfully square to qualify as a hipster or a chav. (Do chavs marry? Do chavs serve in the military? Do hipsters?)
It is easy to rail on her for her appearance, but like the Anonydroid at 11:43 it strikes me as more than a touch catty.
With a husband who is deployed, she is essentially a single mother of two children, one of whom is a two year old. To those of you who have no children, let me share a secret with you: they can run you ragged.
I oppose, and vehemently, all three legs of the "invade, invite, in-hoc" policy our nations are pursuing, but the blame for those policies lies quite above the pay grade of Lance Corporal.
Maybe we should simply knuckle under and celebrate the professional entertainers who are carefully primped, barren, and sing about blowjobs in nightclubs. Oh, if only Mrs. Stevenson were more like Kim Kardashian! (Single, slutty, a true attention whore, etc.)
Hunsdon - and Anon., further up - points taken. However, saying that this tattooed woman looks very low rent and calling out her exhibitionism in wanting to display herself to the world but her childishness in the face of criticism, is not the same as saying that she's the devil incarnate. I'm sure that she has some good qualities, such as being a wife and mother. But it is the essence of modern liberalism that no one is supposed to judge - everyone is a victim, just like this woman is a victim of harsh internet comments.
ReplyDeleteJudging by the dress she wore, she obviously wanted the whole world to see what a wonderful, original person she is with all her tattoos. Well, sorry, but I demur.
As for the notion that she's white, a mother, and a wife of a military man, therefore we shouldn't criticize her, well, I was under the impression that in this neck of the woods, bringing back shaming was in favor. I'm in favor of it. People's bad behavior should be called out. This particular behavior doesn't amount to birthing bastards or drinking oneself into oblivion, but she's deliberately deformed herself and she, and many others, think it's not only acceptable, but praiseworthy. She and they should be shown that many people think otherwise.
@ the proud British anon:
ReplyDeleteRe: when the going gets tough, the tough get going.
You are dead wrong about the meaning of the idiom. It means that the strong rise to the occasion in difficult times. Learn your own language, damn it.
Wiki actually lists both the naive meaning (the literal one) and the ironic meaning. What the original intention was, I cannot say, but I know what it means in small white communities facing, shall we say, "ethnic challenges".
ReplyDeleteAnon.
This kind of excessive, ugly tattooing permeates pop culture and is increasingly not uncommon among young women. People want a respite from it. So obviously they get frustrated when they turn to something more traditional such as this military wives Christmas music and find that it has invaded that as well and is literally in their faces.
ReplyDeleteWiki actually lists both the naive meaning (the literal one) and the ironic meaning. What the original intention was, I cannot say, but I know what it means in small white communities facing, shall we say, "ethnic challenges".
ReplyDeleteNobody uses it the other way.
And it's not really a naive or literal meaning. "Get going" is vague.
Dear Mr. Mangan: I was reacting more to the tone of the comments than to your original post, although I suppose I was, somewhat, reacting to the original post as well. The general tenor of the comments seemed to my mind neither civil nor intelligent---comparing her to poop? Honestly?
ReplyDeleteI do find tattoos to be, well, trashy. The one tattoo I ever seriously considered was a "meat tag" on my buttock, with blood type and social security number, when I was in the service. However, I concluded that with my MOS I was unlikely to ever be blown up, and my general distaste for tattoos was sufficient to keep me from "being inked."
I certainly don't think the positive things she has done are sufficient to elevate her above criticism. However, in comparison with stellar individuals such as Kat Von D and Jesse James, I might have demurred purely as a tactical matter of target selection.
I do find the proliferation of tattoos distressing. To dip a toe into pop culture, for me tattoos will always be the realm of "gypsies, tramps and thieves." Well, and sailors. Had I been the choir director, or involved in the production, I would have encouraged her to cover herself.
On reflection, I think that in my initial response I didn't pay sufficient attention to Mrs. Stevenson's comment that "My tattoos make me stand out from the rest of the girls." In a choir, one should not stand out from the rest.
Wow, there must be an influx of spergs today. The level of commentary to this post seldom rises to the "not ridiculously ostentatious, nor gratuitously florid" standards that the majority of non-autism afflicted blog comment readers use to separate the TLDRs from the concise effort posts.
ReplyDeleteIn the colonies, we ONLY use it the other way.
ReplyDeletePerhaps we are too marinated in cynicism and disgust, having been betrayed for decades by the same weasels now conducting the ethnic cleansing of white England.
Southern California is the next piece of real estate that we will lose, if indeed we have not lost it already. I suspect this will play out much as it did in Africa and elsewhere, where the guilt-mongers, upper class twit-communists and morally sanctimonious were generally the first to literally "get going" when the third world floodgates opened. They and their families decided that the rape, brutality, corruption and crime, which they themselves had unleashed, were, curiously, not for them, but only for the rest of us.
Anon.
The level of commentary to this post seldom rises to the "not ridiculously ostentatious, nor gratuitously florid" standards that the majority of non-autism afflicted blog comment readers use to separate the TLDRs from the concise effort posts.
ReplyDeleteSpoken like a true sperg.
Wait, "you shouldn't judge a book by its cover"?
ReplyDeleteLol. But I assume it is okay to judge a book's cover by its cover, right?
In the colonies, we ONLY use it the other way.
ReplyDeleteAmerica is one of the colonies. It's not used that way. I believe the phrase originated in America.
Anyway, this is getting tiresome. We can agree to disagree.
this shows how ''brave'' all you lot are slagging someone off over the internet..if you knew this lady on a personal basis like i do you wouldnt be so quick to judge he ron hyer looks. Sam is one of the most hygenic people i know, showering twice a day. Before her children came along, samantha was a size 6-8 blonde haired girl. She is extrmemly pretty and a fantastic mother and wife. Her tattos ar e apart of her, before the choir ever came along. The only reason she mad ehte comment that it made her stand out from the girls..is because she is having to explain herself why she has tattoo's in the first place, she never meant it like she should stand out form everyone else, she just meant it as her tattos are unique and make her different, and its not what you would expect someone with a stunning voice like hers to have. If you knew what daily struggles she has raising her autistic son, and very young daughter, her mother is recovering forma serious accident, and all her family live hundreds of miles away in scotland, and her husband was deployed to a terrible place, to judge her on her appearanc eis pathetic and bullying, well done for bullying sam , jealosuy is a terrible disease and you ought to go to the doctors for that. Im proud she is married to my brother and she doesnt conform to what society expect. Like someone said sohuld she look like kim kardashian , the biggest attention media whore?? Tell me have you's lot raised thousands of pounds for charities?? Have you had a xmas number one with your friends?? Are you in all the papers and tv shows or had the opportunties she has had in the last few months?? dont think so..go fuck yourselfs and leave her in peace, and if you knew me you wuoldnt dare say the things aobut her to her face cause i would rip it clean off you lot, you bullying worthless pieces of shit..
ReplyDeleteNow that I have seen some of the videos in full, I find these military wives and their implications for modern times even more horrifying. One thing I noticed were the crass displays of emotion that occurred on the arrival of their husbands home. My father was in the army and I rarely used to see this happen when he and others returned home. I suspect that dysgenic forces over the past few decades have made English people slowly lose the mental discipline to restrain such sentimental outpourings.
ReplyDelete"Please post a civil and intelligent comment, preferably using a screen name other than "anonymous""
ReplyDeletelol
female tattoos are gross, although some of the most decent girls I know have them. some of the sluttiest dont. go figure.
Graybeards... It's a little late to freak out about tattoos.
ReplyDeleteIs Don Giovanni "tasteful" enough for you guys?
"Sam is one of the most hygenic people i know, showering twice a day."
ReplyDeleteReally? I feel like an idiot now. Consider any and all criticism of her and her terrible, hideous tattoos redacted.
BTW Anonymous: I civilly and intelligently despise you.
Yeah, I know, you deleted it. Still, I feel that a rich talentless fraud (Helen Frankenthaler) deserves derision a lot more than a clueless prole girl who honestly earns her living (Samantha Stevenson).
ReplyDeleteThere's a good reason to be opposed to tattoos. They are hideously ugly, especially on women. They make the world ugly, by taking a source of beauty and making it ugly. What drives young women to think that the female form can be improved upon by smears of ugly green ink, or in this woman's case, coarse primary-color doodlings that look like they came out of a child's coloring book?
ReplyDeleteI find her to be a reasonably attractive woman. Or would have, that is. Now she is ugly. She has made herself ugly. There is an important purpose to heaping scorn on such people - to discourage the young and impressionable from making the same mistake.
Anon @12:45 has us pegged dead to rights. We are just jealous shes on TV, and we're not...
ReplyDeleteNo, anon most of us dont care about being on trash TV. Your sister-in-law didnt just happen to have those tattoos, she wore a dress that would show the world how she has defaced her own body. As the blog author says, we here are generally in favor of shaming. She deserves to be shamed for her tattoos, especially in a traditional setting such as military wives, where she sets a bad example.
Yes, Martin B, I agree with you.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if she got the tattoos before her husband's deployment or if she has had them since before she was married.
ReplyDeleteS. Brady wrote two things:
ReplyDelete1: 'Any tattoo on a woman, visible or not, are a mark of sluttishness ...'
I disagree. If a nice young British girl were to get a tattoo celebrating her ethnic identity as one of the pretannoi, it would be a sign of ethnic identification.
This is not an idle point: various neo-pagan ethnic extremists demand tribal identification. If the moderate, non-tattooed Brits stop reproducing and the tattooed Brits use tattoos to enforce ethnic conformity, then tattoos are good for Britain.
2: 'Furthermore, they are singing on behalf of a bunch of patriotards ...'
Absolutely true.
1: 'Any tattoo on a woman, visible or not, are a mark of sluttishness ...'
ReplyDeleteI disagree. If a nice young British girl were to get a tattoo celebrating her ethnic identity as one of the pretannoi, it would be a sign of ethnic identification.
It would be both.
"This kind of excessive, ugly tattooing permeates pop culture and is increasingly not uncommon among young women. People want a respite from it. So obviously they get frustrated when they turn to something more traditional such as this military wives Christmas music and find that it has invaded that as well and is literally in their faces."
ReplyDeleteThis is spot on. It's like fleeing the MSM for the comfort of the alt right and HBD blogs... And then coming across Half-Sigma.
That chick makes Janeane Garafalo look like Grace Kelly.
ReplyDeleteI find that a strange comment. Seems to me that but for her ridiculous mind, Janeane would be very attractive to most men, similar to Sally Field.
"Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteIf you knew what daily struggles she has raising her autistic son, and very young daughter, her mother is recovering forma serious accident, and all her family live hundreds of miles away in scotland, and her husband was deployed to a terrible place,..."
Perhaps she could better help her wee little ones with the dosh she could save by forgoing a few tats.
Of course, any woman is entitled to get herself all tattooed up, if that's what she wants. And I am entitled to voice my observation that it makes her look like a trashy carnival whore.
"Im proud she is married to my brother....."
I've no doubt but that you are.
"alonzo portfolio said...
ReplyDeleteSeems to me that but for her ridiculous mind, Janeane would be very attractive to most men,..."
Yeah, she's a knockout allright:
http://constitutionclub.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/lunapic_131371581278307_1.jpg
I agree that she used to be a pretty young woman, before she decided to uglify herself and, to judge by her pictures, forgo regular bathing. Now, with youth and looks gone, all that's left is a dimwitted, left-wing skank.
I would like to know what was her exact motivation for getting the tattoos. To stand out among the choir? She got these before she became a member of this choir. She probably did want to stand out, but for what reason? If a woman is happily married, why should this be so?
ReplyDeleteIn a monogamous society, conducive to the upholding of civilized values, such exhibitionism would be unwarranted. She has accomplished something by reproducing, unlike the worthless Kardashians, but what example is she setting for her kids?
One must bear in mind that this choir is encouraging support for the British army, which doesn't actually represent authentic British interests but is actually just another tool of the global eiltes, to the same extent that the U.S army is. Due to excessive mental conditioning, members of both outfits are probably are probably less predisposed to white nationalism than would be typical. The only positive note regarding both is their increasing level of incompetence and this we should rejoice in.
We're not judging the book by its cover. We're judging the cover by its cover.
ReplyDeleteShe may be a darling angel.
But it's still an ugly cover.
Her tatoos are unattractive, to say the least. And Dennis is right to point out the silliness and hypocrisy of this woman.
ReplyDeleteBut what I take away from this is that all the "military wives" I saw are white. But if you visit the UK you'll see a helluva lot of non-whites, especially in London. So all those white guys are out there fighting while their country is being demographically stripped from them.
Reminds me of what a Korean War veteran, one who fought Chinese soldiers, would think upon hearing that San Francisco is now the 'most Chinese city in America'.
Tattoos are mindless self-mutilation in the name of non-conformity.
ReplyDeleteThe idiot hipsters with permanent tattoos don't even realize they're wearing uniforms.
crimesofthetimes.com
Who gives a fuck about tattoos? I have them, they are well done and yet I still generaly wear long sleeves. So let me understand this tattoos are meant to be non conformist yet those getting them are conforming, so not getting a tattoo is non conformist. Unless you think in those terms which you all do ergo you are conforming so what the fuck? Just because some many people have tattoos are stupid too, as most of you also are does not make them all stupid. If any of you think you can toe to toe with me in a argument please be my guest. But just for the record you guys are crazy shallow, ignorant, and fairly foul people.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I will give you this. She obviously has got them for the wrong reason. As many D bags to do which ruin it for people that are serious about it. I wish the fad would pass to.
ReplyDelete@Anonymous Jan 11, 2012 12:56 PM
ReplyDeleteI'm not opposed to tattoos because everyone gets them or because nobody gets them. I'm opposed to them because they are vulgar and ugly and because they are hallmarks of a decadent and nihilistic culture of crap.
And by the way, you foul, stupid, shallow.......whatever you are - I don't need lectures from you.
Yes I really think you do. That last sentence was poorly said at best. But hey to each there own.
ReplyDeleteAnd me shallow? I'm not trashing a whole group of people based on cosmetic alteration. What if I said everyone that shaves there head is a product of Neo Nazi Fascism? Pretty much what you guys are doing demonizing tattoos. Something that has become so mainstream I am almost embarrassed to have any.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore I could give a fuck less. I am only here to provide some balance.
ReplyDelete"AnonymousJan 12, 2012 10:21 AM
ReplyDeleteYes I really think you do. That last sentence was poorly said at best."
Rich, coming from someone who has apparently never heard of a comma.
"But hey to each there own."
Well, this is our own. So fuck off.
"Pretty much what you guys are doing demonizing tattoos. Something that has become so mainstream I am almost embarrassed to have any."
You embrace ugliness, we'll call you ugly for it. What's next when tattoos no longer serve to separate you from the washed masses? Tails? Horns? Cosmetic amputation
"I am only here to provide some balance."
I get plenty of "balance" from the slovenly, tattooed and pierced slatterns with who I am forced to interact. We really don't need your "balance".
Haha Christ your intense, you are angry and seem deeply offended. I'll let you win this because there is no speaking with a man like yourself, or woman. And there already is cosmetic amputation and other such disgusting "alterations" like that and has been for years. I find it disgusting also. However you own personality seems very vile. On here you speak with the anger of a psychopath, in person I am sure you would never dare speak like this. Thank god for the internet. Also as for the comma I said your words were poorly said, ineffective the way the read it seems they stuttered right out of your brain. I never said anything about your grammar or typing.
ReplyDeleteAlso I must ask do you think you are attractive? And I am very curious to know are you religious? Clearly this will never end as these internet dick measuring contests never do so this will be my last response, unless you have a interesting enough reply, then I may come back one more time.
ReplyDeleteOne more thing you chop up my responses to fit your need. That's not how real conversation takes place. Anyway enjoy your day.
ReplyDelete"AnonymousJan 12, 2012 11:23 PM
ReplyDeleteAnd there already is cosmetic amputation and other such disgusting "alterations" like that and has been for years. I find it disgusting also."
Well, the normalization of deviant behavior, like tattoos, will only make even the even more extreme deviancy, like mutilationi, more prevalent. After all, what's a kid with pierced and tatted parents going to have to do to shock them?
"However you own personality seems very vile. On here you speak with the anger of a psychopath, in person I am sure you would never dare speak like
this."
Don't give me that armchair psychiatrist horseshit. I'm older and wiser than you, and I have nothing to learn from a middling mind such as yours. And, by the way, it isn't anger - it's disgust.
"Also as for the comma I said your words were poorly said, ineffective the way the read it seems they stuttered right out of your brain. I never said anything about your grammar or typing."
At least I generally get the words to the typewriter in tact, and with proper grammar and punctuation. I guess you're too busy being a daring non-conformist to be bothered with bourgeois stuff like that.
People here are demonstrating the right of freedom of speech, some are pushing the boundaries when it comes to the legality of abusing others, freedom of speech none the less.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure people would be in an uproar if freedom of speech was only given to the upper classes, people with a minimum of a masters qualification, people who have children in wedlock, and people work in white collar jobs.
People are free to express themselves however they see fit, that woman wants to express herself through tattooing.
Just because others do not like, or even want to express THEMSELVES in that way, does not mean they should direct vile abuse and nasty language to those who do want to express themselves in such a way.
Where do the double standards end, what if someone dislikes another person because the colour of their skin, accent, hair colour. Can they express the same bile towards them?.
People talk about civil liberties but are hypocrites when it comes to the liberties they think people should have. Freedom in a democratic society means that people cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their appearance. All appearances.
If you don't like tattoo's and think they are scummy, then don't have them, and don't socialise with people that do have them, but you do not have the right to abuse people and slander those who do.
If you condone the behaviour directed at the woman, then you condone racism, the murder of the goth girl in the park, homophobia, and school bullying.
In the scheme of things tattoos are so insignificant, I think being an abusive hypocrite is far worse than an thoughtful person with tattoos.
It doesnt really matter if you like tatts or not. These tatts are utterly disgusting. Period. End of.
ReplyDeleteThe amount of ignorance on here is far more disgusting than this woman's tattoos. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
ReplyDeleteThe amount of effort put into the above post is undetectably small.
ReplyDelete"... ignorance ..."
"You should ashamed ..."
It's like it was written by a computer.
The more leftists convince themselves that people are robots, the more they start to behave like robots.