Saturday, September 24, 2011

Putin to Reclaim Russian Presidency


The NYT reports that Vladimir Putin will likely return to the Russian presidency next year.

Maybe he's a dictator, I couldn't say. There seems little doubt that Russia is a fairly corrupt place and that murder is among the sanctions against anyone who gets in the way of the ruling class. Murder, but significantly, not mass murder, unlike under the former rulers of Russia.

That aside, can there be any doubt that Putin will do what is in the interests of the Russian nation? Unlike Western leaders, who disdain their own people and shout down or arrest anyone (such as Wilders) who too vocally questions the immigration and diversity mandate, Putin isn't beholden to any PC nonsense about the strength of diversity or the peacefulness of Islam.

Furthermore, Putin is personally quite the alpha, and it wouldn't be too much to say that with him, the personal is the political. His masculine style - and I say that without irony - carries over into his politics. Or maybe it's his politics carrying over into his style. Whatever, Putin eschews the feminine, emotionally laden politics of the West. While he seems to care deeply about the Russian people, you'll never hear him say, "But what about the children."

In a sane world, we would forgo the absurd, thankless, and impossible tasks of trying to turn Afghanistan and Iraq into Western doppelgangers, and revert to the older, great power form of foreign affairs. And we'd see Russia for what it is: a potential ally.

57 comments:

  1. I've been wondering which language I should learn. Sometimes I think German. Maybe Russian?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Russia is one of the last places we should be seeking to confront. The Cold War was another manipulated scam to divide us.

    Anon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Brilliant juxtaposition of photos, Dennis.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Do you have any idea how many Muslims Putin let into Russia?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here's a video of hundreds of thousands of Muslims celebrating Ramadhan in Moscow.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1B_IRarnFo

    Also, Putin is a try hard. His photo ops are comical.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Do you have any idea how many Middle-Eastern Muslims Putin has let into Russia?

    Here's a video of hundreds of thousands of Muslims celebrating Ramadhan in Moscow.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1B_IRarnFo

    Also, Putin is a try hard. His photo ops are comical. Medvedev is better.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Putin is alpha, indeed. He's done a good job at reducing the power of the corrupt oligarchs.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like Putin, but he's a shy, wily, cunning operator type, not a natural alpha. The whole alpha image thing is the product of well crafted PR.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus is another anti-globalist leader who is vilified by the West:

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/08/social-nationalism-the-political-thought-of-alexander-lukashenko-of-belarus/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Two pictures worth a thousand words.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Putin may be a son-of-a-bitch, but he's my kind of a son-of-a-bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Putin, the George W. Bush of Russia.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "I like Putin, but he's a shy, wily, cunning operator type, not a natural alpha."

    I'm a native Russian speaker. How does Putin normally come off in interviews? He's not a natural charmer. Nothing in common with guys like Bill Clinton or George Clooney - he's not THAT kind of an alpha. This may cause some to call him shy, but he has far more self-confidence than most people who call themselves shy. He comes off as very self-disciplined, tough with himself. A lot of senior military officers from a variety of cultures have this sort of vibe - too self-disciplined, controlled, too demanding of themselves and of others to appear charming. But he's as self-confident as your average charmer, so the "shy" designation is only partly appropriate here.

    You often see him straining to phrase things as exactly and precisely as possible, in a way that would live up to a high, demanding conception of how a head of state should talk. It's hard to look cool while straining to do anything.

    In more relaxed moments he comes off as humble, gentle, guileless, unassuming. Kind of an "I'm just a regular guy, a rube, what's all the fuss about?" feeling. And I don't think that's phony, I think that's actually him. "Wily, cunning" - I haven't noticed that at all. Admittedly, I'm a big fan of his, so perhaps I wouldn't.

    As for intelligence, he comes off as a smart man of the people, a man of action, not necessarily of books. Again, picture a smart general officer from a lower middle class or a working class background. The word "intelligentsia" is of Russian origin, and there are millions of that sort of people in Russia. He's not from that class at all. He doesn't have their mannerisms. But he's plenty smart. Medvedev, however, IS from the intelligentsia class.

    Yeltsin was more macho, vastly less disciplined, more irresponsible, but he wasn't cunning or wily either. Ethnic Russians are very rarely cunning or wily.

    ReplyDelete

  14. I'm a native Russian speaker.


    I doubt it. No mistakes.

    ReplyDelete
  15. That aside, can there be any doubt that Putin will do what is in the interests of the Russian nation?

    I'm sure Putin pursues what he thinks are in Russia's interests as a world power, but does he pursue Russia's interests as a nation of Russians? That's what really counts. I think there are far too many Caucasians and Central Asians in Russia (many illegally) to say that Putin is really a good nationalist leader.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Just watching the DSK issue of Law and Order.

    They are scum! They have departed from the real script. Scum!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Agree that those pictures are great.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "I doubt it. No mistakes."

    Heh. Thanks. Но родился и вырос я в Москве. Великий, могучий пока не забыл.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I am another native Russian speaker. But I am not a fan of Putin at all. Granted, he is an improvement when compared to that fool Yeltsin. Other than that, Putin is simply selling Russia to a different mafia than the one Yeltsin sold Russia to. All there is there is one mafia (Putin's former KGB buddies and their henchmen) taking over another (old fashioned thieves and Jewish interests who prospered under Yeltsin).

    That's Harley-Davidson, by the way. One would think that he could have shown support for struggling Russian manufacturers like URAL or
    IZH by maybe riding one for a stupid childish photo op?

    ReplyDelete
  20. "can there be any doubt that Putin will do what is in the interests of the Russian nation?": of course: he'll rule it in his own interest.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The neocons hate Putin because he kicked the Jewish oligarchs out of the country. Imagine that, a Russian leader wanting ethnic Russians to control Russian assets. The nerve!

    Dmitry Rogozin envisions a new world order where the "North" (Canada, Europe, China, Japan, Russia, Australia, etc.) sides against the Global South (Africa, Middle East, Latin (Mestizo) America, India, etc.).

    Many Russians would like to see such an alignment but the neocons would never allow it to happen.

    http://rt.com/politics/interview-with-dmitry-rogozin-2008-11-18/

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'm not a native Russian speaker---I do know four or five words though!---and I like Putin. Not flawless, of course, but vastly better than the froth we have here in America.

    I'm also a fan of, of all people, Nursultan Nazarbaev, president (for life) of Kazakhstan. An autocrat, sure, not entirely moved by a concern for human rights, sure, and there's a reason everyone called him Mister Ten Percent, even back in the 90s. Still and all, his police and security services don't wantonly kill people. (Emphasis on wantonly.)

    I have the idea that Nazarbaev looks on Kazakhstan as the family business, and he plans on handing it down to his children when he's gone, and he wants to hand down a going concern when he does so. In a rough neighborhood, he's playing a skillful hand, balancing the US, China, Russia, and the whole Islamic question. I'd swap Obama for Nazarbaev with players to be named later, and I said the same thing about George W.

    I'm increasingly starting to be concerned that we have made democracy and capitalism into intrinsic goods (or gods), rather than simply what seemed to be better means to an end.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Even if he isn't explicitly nationalist, Putin is a huge improvement over the american/european elites because he is highly competent.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Dennis - Most people who post on this blog are generally against mass immigration to the US.
    For me personally I think that overall, people with an IQ over 125 generally contribute a great deal to our nation by creating businesses and jobs and paying taxes.

    If we require IQ tests of any potential immigrant, and then we only allow in to America those potential immigrants that test over 125, and we allow no one in with an IQ under 125, In my humble opinion our country will be better off in the future.

    I support Putin since he does what is best for Russia, but may I ask does Putin seek to prevent low IQ people from moving to Russia and encourage super high IQ people from moving in?

    I seem to recall reading that huge numbers of low IQ immigrants from Central Asia have moved to Russia under Putin's leadership and he hasn't acted to prevent this or if he has acted he hasn't been effective

    ReplyDelete
  25. At least he is not trying to screw his own people.

    Anon.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Dmitry Rogozin envisions a new world order where the "North"

    I actually know Rogozin. (A friend of a friend of a friend back when we all were in college). Disgusting piece of shit. He started as a Komsomol leader, despicable commie. I always felt that the guy would sell his own mother if the money offered is good enough. But maybe that's a common trait among politicians. A very smart guy with a super acute sense of opportunity for sure. He is an ultra nationalist now but that's just the ecological niche he found. He'd feel equally at home in Obama administration if necessary.

    Hunsdon said...
    I'm also a fan of, of all people, Nursultan Nazarbaev, president (for life) of Kazakhstan.

    You probably would not be if you were an ethnic Russian living in Kazakhstan. Think whites in South Africa. They brought civilization there, built the country and now they are treated as second class citizens. Massive emigration of Russians and Ukrainians from Kazakhstan continues. (Practically all Jews and Germans already left). And the average Kazakh IQ is relatively low, so Nazarbaev's delusions of grandeur about Kazakhstan becoming an economic powerhouse will never materialize. They will last for a while under Dubai model though.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous said:

    Hunsdon said...
    I'm also a fan of, of all people, Nursultan Nazarbaev, president (for life) of Kazakhstan.

    You probably would not be if you were an ethnic Russian living in Kazakhstan.

    Hunsdon replies:

    I entirely agree! When I was working in Almaty, the cleaning woman for our office was Russian. One day I asked her what she'd done in the past; she had worked as a physicist. Now, I'm not a physicist, but she could certainly explain physics in a coherent manner. (At first I doubted her, so she gave me a five minute intro to physics, in Russian.) She'd been replaced by Kazakhs, and now she was cleaning toilets.

    The sense I had was that this was one thing Nazarbaev had to somewhat cave in on. I think greatly reducing the Russian population is wrong and short sighted. I could be entirely wrong, but I had the sense, as I say, that the Kazakhs simply wanted the occupiers gone. And compared with the very visceral anti-Russian feelings I encountered in Ukraine, the anti-Russian movement was subtle and nuanced in Kazakhstan.

    Besides, as an ethno-nationalist, or a "1965 American" who am I to say it's wrong of the Kazakhs to want their country back?

    ReplyDelete
  28. But would he make examples of people who criticize him.

    Clearly the cartels are trying to become legitimate state actors ...

    ReplyDelete
  29. That picture reminded me of this one:

    http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2011/02/14/gal_celeb_pres_crew.jpg

    The only vibe I get from Putin is that of a rat, a creep, and a blowhard. But if he is what the Russians want - or if he is what they are told they want - well they are welcome to him for all I care.

    I quite agree that our policy should not be what it has been (especially under the previous administration): to needlessly antagonize Russia over matters in it's own sphere of influence.

    ReplyDelete
  30. If the Russian commenters are still reading, I'd like to know their take on why Russia has a violent crime rate more similar to that of African countries than white countries.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Putin has recently displayed much solidarity with Dmitry Rogozin, who thinks non-Europeans and non-Ethnic Russians should be deported from Russia. Rogozin is a good guy -- a true pro-Western patriot.

    I suspect the commenter above criticizing Putin and Rogozin is a neocon. Typical.

    ReplyDelete
  32. The ancestral hatred that neocons / Trotskyites have for Russia (going all the way back to the USSR’s purging of the Trotskyites) should have no bearing upon Western foreign policy. We should have amicable relations with Russia, our white neighbor to the East.

    Great recent op-ed by Pat Buchanan:

    Why is Obama Regime Trying to Start War with Russia?

    Patrick J. Buchanan

    August 22nd, 2011

    http://buchanan.org/blog/why-are-we-baiting-the-bear-4833

    ReplyDelete
  33. Looks all you need to do to earn a cargo cult-like veneration from American WNists is to throw a few crooked Jews into prison (though somehow I don't think Obama is going to get any props for jailing Bernie Madoff)

    ReplyDelete
  34. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Has Putin done anything to contain or expel troublesome non-Russian tribes from Russia? When Anonymous at 11:50 PM says:

    Other than that, Putin is simply selling Russia to a different mafia than the one Yeltsin sold Russia to. All there is there is one mafia (Putin's former KGB buddies and their henchmen) taking over another (old fashioned thieves and Jewish interests who prospered under Yeltsin).

    it merely makes me think that Putin is siding with his own gang, and has no real interest in preserving the Russian people. He is merely self-interested, and wants his side to win. However, that does indicate that if Putin's interests align with an ethno-nationalist movement's interests, he would work for the interests of ethnic Russians. This is better than the traitors who have consecrated themselves to the multikult.

    ReplyDelete
  36. "For me personally I think that overall, people with an IQ over 125 generally contribute a great deal to our nation by creating businesses and jobs and paying taxes."

    What matters to you is money and 'respectability' in the eyes of human sheep. Not the existence of your people. You disgust me.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Putin seems to me to be a failure, merely a more competent gangster. He's done nothing to transition Russia from oil based exports to manufacturing. He's done nothing to deal with Iran and Turkey as strategic threats to the South, or reformulate the armed forces, which remain a disgrace and performed miserably against Georgia. Putin picks fights with a weak Obama administration and is far too cozy with a strategic threat, China, which has ambitions to simply take over the Russian Far East.

    Putin has not addressed demographic collapse, nor the reasons for it (lack of easily affordable family life in Russia) nor given his countrymen an easily digestible nationalism, a reason FOR Russia to exist in the first place, that is consistent with the demands of the modern world (wealth creation, technological advances). Gifted with some incredibly smart people, he has done nothing to advance Russia into space, or bio-med, or anything else.

    If you want to launch satellites, Russia is your last not your first choice. If you need advanced medical help, Russia is your last not your first choice.

    He's done well, by killing lots of people. But that takes no talent at all. He's like a small time, ME tyrant, He's not even Agathocles. More like a Borgia Pope.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Whiskey is wrong as usual. Putin came into power in 1999 long after the rot had set in following the collapse of the USSR. It was largely due to the general effects of collapse and the vultures who infested Russia after the fall of the USSR and tried to pick it apart.

    And he's factually wrong about the Russian space industry. Russia still has great space capabilities. Their space capabilities are superior in many ways to ours. The Soyuz launch vehicle is the most frequently used and most reliable launch vehicle in the world:

    http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Delta_Mission/SEM8XK57ESD_0.html

    And the claim that the Russian military "performed miserably" is just neocon propaganda.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Putin is aware of Russian demographic collapse and the reasons for it:

    http://michael-hudson.com/2011/09/russian-ripoff/

    "President Putin, now Prime Minister Putin, has said that the demographic effect of just privatizing Russian real estate, and industry and following western advice has lost maybe 30 million Russians from what the normal demographic growth would be to 2050. So the effect of neo-liberal financial policy has been more devastating to Russia than WW2."

    ReplyDelete
  40. cont.

    "But none of this export revenue from the hole in the ground should really be turned over to the state – we want to make sure that you only tax labor and tax business, but don’t tax natural resources – let it all be privatized. And so Russia thought, gee this sounds like a funny way to get rich but that’s what they did. And so they followed the Harvard advice to give away the oil, the nickel companies, the mineral resources, and that’s how they got the money to begin sending it all to the west. There wasn’t any Russian money to buy these companies because the IMF and World Bank wiped out Russian savers with a hyper inflation by getting rid of all the capital controls and letting the rouble float. So it was just one bad advice after another and now the Russians realize they’ve been taken."

    "There are the oligarchs and while Russia is known for the fact that much of the population is in poverty the fact is that they’ve created an awful lot of billionaires, almost more than anywhere else by giving them all of the land, resources, oil and the gas. So all the billionaires do what they do in other countries. They pretty much control the government and they’ve convinced the government to stop providing schooling and to close down many of the schools, especially in engineering, and they control the media so people really aren’t discussing the kind of thing that we’re discussing here.

    That came out pretty clearly. The head of the economics section of the Academy of Sciences did ask me to write up most of these ideas to put them into discussion but the discussion has been almost entirely censored by the neo-liberal advisers who they brought over, ever since Jeffrey Sachs and the Harvard boys all came over and said don’t follow any advice but ours – there was a choice and they don’t realize in Russia that there was a choice.

    For instance in 1991 my friend Ted Gwartney went over to St Petersburg in Moscow and offered to make a land map for them and said, look, if you make a land map and the price of real estate goes up, if the rental value of these homes goes up this should be your tax base and you’ll have the money to continue to spend on infrastructure – you won’t have to tax your labor and you can make your industry into a world competitive force.

    Well he was told by the World Bank that’s not our plan. Our plan is to have a flat tax – to tax labor, not to tax land and resources because we want the West to buy up these resources. We want to buy it all and we don’t want to be taxed. We want the Russians to pay the tax and then we want all of their skilled labor to go to the West and that will cripple them. Russia’s poverty is the West’s benefit in this case and the result was that Russia became the world’s leading stock market from 1994 to 1997 and made enormous fortunes for Wall Street speculators while essentially emptying out Russian capital, labor, industry and the same thing happened in the Baltics."

    ReplyDelete
  41. cont.

    "The birth rate has fallen, life spans are shortening, and this is throughout the former Soviet Union. People of working age are emigrating. Instead of getting rid of the old Stalinist bureaucracy the neo-liberals simply privatized it and the result of course is corruption."

    "What’s unique is that, just imagine, 20 years ago when there was the revolution that turned over power to Yeltsin in Russia and broke up the Soviet Union there wasn’t any debt at all. Families had all been living in their homes without paying rent and getting a free public education, public services were free and employers provided lunch, vacations and pensions, cultural and all of these connections were pulled up. And all of a sudden instead of just turning over the property to the people who lived in the homes and the businesses that used the offices the government said, okay, we are going to put it all up for sale and let the banks, usually the foreign banks, lend you the money, to buy it.

    And the result was the biggest real estate bubble in the world in the mid 90’s and this is what started the whole real estate bubble- certainly what catalyzed it in the west because all of a sudden Russians, Latvians, Estonians and other people had to take on a lifetime of debt in order to get the homes that they’d been living in and not be thrown out on the street. So essentially they were told your money or your life – that’s neo- liberalism."

    "Very little because they’d already in 1991 dismantled their industry. They were told that the way to get rich was to become a raw materials exporter or what the American protectionists and the bible called “hewers of wood and drawers of water”. So Russia simply dismantled its industry. The west said, oh, you’re not competitive and what the Russians didn’t realize is that all of this was very self serving to the west. The West, especially the American planners- the Harvard boys that went over said, well, we really don’t want is for Russia ever to be a military threat. We’d like to conquer it, to break it up, let’s now just slam them at the end of the cold war.

    So without an industrial, manufacturing base there can’t really be much of a military. So the first thing they did was say – get rid of your manufacturing, get rid of your engineering, begin charging for your schooling, close down the schools – you don’t need engineers all you really need to do is make a hole in the ground.

    ReplyDelete
  42. It's hard to get an accurate read on Russia, but there are signs that Putin et al are coming to realize that building a strong Russian middle class based on high middle class wages relative to middle class real estate prices is more important than controlling trade routes or importing wage slaves. This realization could result in a turn around in Russian demographic decline coupled with a rise of hard — and by that I mean manufacturing, mining, etc. — technological creation.

    All Russia has to do beyond building its middle class with policies precisely the opposite of those pursued by the West, is keep its geopolitical space secure. The approach taken by the West of trying to control resources and to commoditize the creation of technology via lowered standard of living for its real creators, will ensure the rise of Russia as a world-class economic power while the West declines into a northern version Brazil.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Dennis you should read Anatoliy Golitsyn's works. Everything that has happened in post-communist Russia was predicted by the former Russian intelligence analyst Golitsyn. Mark Riebling, an American foreign policy wonk, noted that Golitsyn is THE most accurate forecaster of the post-communist Russia, out of 194 predictions from his 1980s book "New Lies for Old" he got 139 predictions right. Here's wikipedia on his major predictions: In 1984, Golitsyn published the book New Lies For Old, wherein he predicted the collapse of the communist bloc orchestrated from above. He warned about a long-term deception strategy designed to lull the West into a false sense of security, and finally economically cripple and diplomatically isolate the United States. Among other things, Golitsyn stated: "The 'liberalization' [in the Soviet Union] would be spectacular and impressive. Formal pronouncements might be made about a reduction in the communist party's role; its monopoly would be apparently curtailed." "If [liberalization] should be extended to East Germany, demolition of the Berlin Wall might even be contemplated." "The European Parliament might become an all-European socialist parliament with representation from the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. 'Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals' would turn out to be a neutral, socialist Europe."

    Also check out the Amazon reviews: http://www.amazon.com/New-Lies-Old-Anatoliy-Golitsyn/dp/0945001134

    ReplyDelete
  44. "If the Russian commenters are still reading, I'd like to know their take on why Russia has a violent crime rate more similar to that of African countries than white countries. "

    I raised this issue months ago on an earlier thread here. It's a fascinating topic worth exploring from an HBD perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  45. "If the Russian commenters are still reading, I'd like to know their take on why Russia has a violent crime rate more similar to that of African countries than white countries. "

    This is simply not true. Most of the post-USSR crime in Russia was related to organized crime, some of which wasn't even controlled by whites / ethnic Russians (but by Ashkenazis and Chechens). And the violence of organized crime is quite different from the violence of blacks, which tends to be unorganized and random.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Put it this way.

    Russia is one of the few white countries that is taking pro-active steps to (1) increase white fertility and (2) make life very difficult for non-whites so they will leave (attrition).

    Russia may still have more work to do, but at she's trying.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Whiskey: "Putin has not addressed demographic collapse"

    This is completely untrue. Russia is one of the few white countries that is taking pro-active steps to increase white fertility.

    Russia has recently all but banned the international adoption of white Russian children and is taking economic steps to encourage white women to have white babies.

    Sure, there are still problems, but at least Russia is doing something.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Martin B is right about Putin's character. Yeltsin impacted history by selecting a KGB operative as Russia's new leader. Putin is devious, smart, and very confidident. Think Lt. Colonel Alexander Litvinenko in UK with polonium inside him. The story of his parting with Putin is very disturbing because the manner of assassination had to be State sponsored.Russia's history is full of such terrible acts.

    WNists dreaming of a Russian model of white purity may well comprehend the realities involved but I doubt it. I spent 14 days in Moscow during 1995 and almost didn't get out due to "legal" complications. While I enjoyed the art museums and my Kremlin tour, I felt severely alienated from this austere culture. I had failed to read enough history and felt imprisoned there. If Russia is to be our model of a peaceful white kingdom, I prefer our more chaotic but more open model.To admire Putin is to dream in rather demented authoritarian terms.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Cornelius Troost,
    "Russia's history is full of such terrible acts.
    If Russia is to be our model of a peaceful white kingdom, I prefer our more chaotic but more open model.To admire Putin is to dream in rather demented authoritarian terms."
    You are too old and fossilized in your views; you need to pass away already. The continuing influence of types like you is the reason why the Western Whites (i.e., North Americans and Western Europeans) cannot, even at this late hour, reconcile with the Eastern Whites (i.e., Russians and Slavs) in order to forge a common front against the deadly problems plaguing them both (Islamic jihadis, Third World hordes, anti-white racism, demographic collapse, mass non-white immigration, etc., etc.).

    ReplyDelete
  50. Conservative DemSep 26, 2011 02:45 PM

    Were that we had such statesmen as Putin:

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/JA08Ag01.html

    ReplyDelete
  51. For parbes:
    People like you easily alienate most of the conservatives of Mangan's and related blogs because you are seriously handicapped by both a lack of good character and a lack of knowledge.Warped by anti-Semitism and hostile to more moderate views, you make any notion of solidarity absolutely impossible. Most HBD types share a scientific foundation that enables them to imagine a nation that is both pluralistic and meritocratic without Hitlerian racism. The deeper hatred of WN's is entirely dystopian and empty.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Conservative DemSep 26, 2011 02:56 PM

    Anonymous 6:21 AM-

    Perhaps you are right, but judging from the prevalence of advertisements such as this

    http://www.anastasiadates.com/

    one must suppose that Putin quite a way to go to shore up Russia's demographic decline, if quality breeding stock is still on auction to the West.

    One wonders if the day will come when American women similarly seek to sell themselves to the highest Chinese or such bidders, after the earning power of the American male has been entire vitiated by the so-called "free trade" policies beloved by the neocons.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Cornelius Troost said:
    "Warped by anti-Semitism and hostile to more moderate views, you make any notion of solidarity absolutely impossible. Most HBD types share a scientific foundation that enables them to imagine a nation that is both pluralistic and meritocratic without Hitlerian racism."
    I am not anti-Semitic (I am a supporter of Israel), and I certainly don't subscribe to "Hitlerian racism". YOU, sir, however, are Russophobic and extremely parochial Western white in your views. And this attitude is what is leading the white race into ruin, at precisely the moment in history when genuine goodwill and cooperation between the Western and the Eastern white nations is most essential for survival!

    ReplyDelete
  54. For Conservative Dem:

    You are on target about the sleaze growing rapidly across Russia. Economic despair leads to dysfunctional outcomes but Russia underwent moral decay on a vast scale as they were subjected to the Marxism of Lenin and Stalin.Never before had a whole people had their religion torn away forcibly.Today the slime of pop culture from the West covers all of Russia as political corruption reigns and Putin prepares for his return to supremacy.The Russian people, whose morality was essentially decimated, never were able to restore its fabric as the fall of the USSR opened the gates for bandit capitalism and KGB-style political power combined with stupendous wealth grabs by a handful of oligarchs like Berezovsky and Gusinsky.

    In Moscow in 1995 among 11 million people I saw 2 impeccably dressed black men from some embassy. They were the only blacks I ever saw and I reflected on the oddity of their existance there. Still, I considered Moscow to be an entirely alien place where I would never wish to live. The idea that whites would oneday unite according to the dreams of WN's is both silly and highly improbable. The factors that make humans diverse, while celebrated by some, also offer dangerous obstacles to any plot to unify what is too varied to co-exist. The wars and minor conflicts of history, including white on white clashes, are an insuperable reality. On the other hand, teaching liberal values erodes our source of sound judgment and educated discernment. We become brainless hedonists and blind and tasteless fools who believe in quackery and false equality. Hip-Hop is equal to Beethoven! It is ironic that Chinese Americans are actively attempting to restore classical music's stature amidst our cultural decline.

    There is no white paradise but our society might still be saved by strong leadership with conservative values and a defense of inequality and hierarchy. Talent, brains, and athleticism are distributed unequally and our culture must treat each as an individual. If various races display unequal academic outcomes-which they do- then so be it. Why should nature obey political dreams? I watched a sea of orange roar with frenzied glee as an all black Clemson football team scored a touchdown. Only a few years back these folks were rabid racists. In football color is now king as fanatical whites deem winning everything. Nonetheless, we refuse to acknowledge the truth about IQ differences because this is the supreme taboo of liberalism.Ignorance and confusion are rampant.The power of political propaganda exceeds all rational efforts to educate our dim-witted masses.Indeed, education is now based entirely upon liberal precepts.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Troost,

    So tell us what everyone wants to know - are the Russians apes or angels?

    ReplyDelete
  56. Still, I considered Moscow to be an entirely alien place where I would never wish to live.

    Was it the architecture? St. Petersburg has more Western architecture and style. Did you visit there?

    ReplyDelete
  57. Damn, that Putin photo made me laugh, because it looks like this:

    http://www.reverseshot.com/files/images/pre-issue22/idiocracy2.gif

    ReplyDelete

Please post a civil and intelligent comment, preferably using a screen name other than "anonymous". Comments are not currently moderated and their publication does not imply the agreement of the blog's author.