Monday, June 27, 2011

Black Mobs and Carter Strange

An 18-year-old white man named Carter Strange was nearly beaten to death by a gang of blacks in Columbia, South Carolina. For the story, see Occidental Dissent, OneSTDV, VFR, and others.

Meanwhile, mobs of black mostly teenagers have been terrorizing Chicago, Peoria, Miami, and elsewhere. See Unamusement Park (throughout) for good coverage.

First of all, OneSTDV communicates the requisite degree of outrage, especially at the Carter Strange story. A good white kid gets nearly killed and probably permanently brain-damaged solely for the crime of being white. While in a nation of over 300 million people horrible crime stories can always be dredged up, the Strange and the other stories certainly suggest a pattern. The real outrage, other than that which we ought to feel at any story of innocents victimized by violent crime, is that the elites in media and the government are actively covering up this pattern of black-on-white violence, and furthermore accuse whites who notice it of racism.

In an imaginary world where these things were honestly reported, what would the consequences be? Surely not renewed calls for anti-black discrimination; but it would be a first step toward acknowledging the anti-white attitudes of many, perhaps a majority, of blacks, and the violent tendencies of young, black men. And that might lead to the beginning of the end of the widespread accusation that whites are inherently racist and that virtually all of the blame for the social pathologies and underachievement of black Americans can be laid at the feet of white Americans.

We can't have that. The charge of racism is the biggest and most effective weapon in the arsenal of the elites and their media lackeys. Honestly reporting these incidents would the first step in disarming the anti-white establishment. This may account for the reluctance, nay refusal, to do some honest reporting.

Another thing here is that the media and elites themselves bear some responsibility for these incidents. When mobs of blacks scream "kill all the white people" - as they did in Peoria - one can't help but think that on some level the young savages who did these crimes believe in the depths of their alleged minds that they are justified in feeling the way they do. Why would that be? Anyone, even the least cognizant among us, must be aware that whites are constantly blamed for black social pathology, including poverty. Therefore much black-on-white crime is merely the result of playing out the media/elite script.

104 comments:

  1. I chuckled a little bit thinking "peoria... pretoria"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mr. Mangan: your posts are always well reasoned.

    The question is what do we do about it? How do we expand the audience beyond the people who are already understand the problem? We know the media shuts down comments, or selectively deletes comments, when these incidents happen. I wish there was a way to let people who get their comments deleted know about blogs like this one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think most whites, including a majority of self segregating liberals, are aware of what's really happening.
    But most whites can still afford to isolate themselves in suburban/rural enclaves, and therefore aren't being directly affected. This allows the media and their talking heads to spin this any way they please, and suffer no real consequence.
    Of course, ignoring the racial reality will only insure this problem expands and gets worse.
    Unfortunately, many more people are going to have to suffer at the hands of black mobs before this turns into a "national" story.
    The tide might not turn until someone relatively famous gets jumped, or caught up in the middle of this. Or that it more deaths result from a mob assault.
    One thing is for sure, blacks have no reason to stop any of this, and liberal media pundits will continue to cover for them.
    And that means the black racist violence will continue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lew: "We know the media shuts down comments, or selectively deletes comments," -

    Sure, but: I read the comments that weren't censored on the Chicago Tribune articles defending their "race-blind" reporting policy. Commenters were overwhelmingly in favor of reporting the race of the mobs. Many went further - hell, they sounded like the people who post here. Liberal voices attacking them were few. I don't know how representative they were, but it's evidence for Caleo's point that most whites do know what's really happening and are fed up with the BS the media is feeding them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The list of grievances keeps growing.

    When Civil War II happens, there will be an enormous backlash.

    Payback is unpleasant.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There's been more of this that's gone on without being pegged as a race based attack. The perps often like to divest their victims of their valuables while they're going about their sport of ambushing whites, so the crime is usually just classified and reported (if at all) as one of material gain, non-racial and "random".
    However, the items taken are actually a trophy of their hunt and seen as icing on the cake; they could buy those i-toys they take if they wanted to just like they buy their $100+ gym shoes. It's just part of the thrill.
    If they take even a penny it's quickly passed off as just ordinary crime and thus avoids bringing up unpleasant issues.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It seems like security arbitrage. I've been to grocery stores in Chicago that didn't let you walk down the aisle; criminals will migrate to areas with less security and policing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "The list of grievances keeps growing.

    When Civil War II happens, there will be an enormous backlash.

    Payback is unpleasant."

    Aye.



    Not perfectly on-topic but sort-of relevant

    Watching the latest TSA shenanigans:

    http://beta.news.yahoo.com/blogs/trending-now/outrage-over-intimate-tsa-pat-down-gay-pride-161530133.html?nc

    TSA patted down a 95-y-o woman in a wheelchair and made her remove her Depends.

    Note: The above link came from the yahoo.com front page. When you go to yahoo, the title for the news brief "TSA's bewildering search angers the web," the picture shows a Black woman. Is this a picture of the agent and the elderly woman or a stock photo? Don't know.

    BUT, since Blacks are overrepresented as TSA agents, as in all gov't jobs, and old White women are targets for "enhanced screenings," as anyone who's flown with an elderly lady knows, I assert that this policy of TSA's of searching Depends-wearing, wheelchair-bound, old White ladies to "protect us from terrorists" is just another opportunity for Blacks to stick it to Whitey any chance they get.

    I can just imagine the, probably Black, TSA agent's gleeful feelings of job satisfaction when she got home.

    They beat nearly to death young White boys and sexually molest helpless, sick, old White women. It's all part of their stealth race war against us.

    ReplyDelete
  9. JSM, I saw this story (95 year old woman molested by TSA) at Gateway Pundit - she was White, of course. I'm not sure of the color/ethnicity of the TSA agents, but would hazard a guess they weren't White.

    ReplyDelete
  10. In all fairness, white on black crime back in the old days, i.e. lynchings, etc, was tolerated for a great many years. Like they say, karma sure can be a...

    ReplyDelete
  11. @YS - Go f@ck yourself, you lying troll/piece of trash.

    There is no equivalent in the 'old days' of the type of violence whites now have to endure at the hands of blacks.

    ReplyDelete
  12. To further address the lies of the filthy troll, Yan Shen, here is a relevant post from One's comment thread.


    "In the years 1882 to 1968, the official statistics are that 3,446 blacks were lynched by whites in the U.S. So about 40 lynchings per year. Each year on average, there are 770,000 violent incidents of rape, murder, assualt, robbery perpetrated by blacks against whites or whites against blacks. In 85% of these cases, blacks are the perpetrators and whites the victims. So there are about 540,000MORE acts of violence PER YEAR perpetrated by blacks against whites than vice-versa."

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yan Shen you really do show your colors at certain times. Often you try to come across as some sort of ally to European peoples and try to direct our comments against non-white immigration against only Africans and Latins, and not against your North East Asians cohorts. You assure us that the NE Asians are intelligent and sympatico with Europeans and would be a good fit.

    Yet at other times, like your stupid comment today, you show your hatred for Europeans. Let's look at the facts about lynching, which affected BOTH black and white.

    The Tuskegee Institute has recorded 3,446 lynchings of blacks and 1,297 lynchings of whites between 1882 and 1968.

    That comes out to about 40 lynchings of blacks per year. How does this number compare to the 100 black on white rapes per day and the thousands of black on white murders per year? Throw in robbery and other crimes and your comparison of today's crime with lynching seems pretty weak. Or maybe it just shows where your sympathies lie. So much for trusting the North East Asians to be our friends.

    ReplyDelete
  14. And, our resident yellow supremacist pops off again.

    "In all fairness, white on black crime back in the old days, i.e. lynchings, etc, was tolerated for a great many years. Like they say, karma sure can be a..."

    What fairness?

    You're saying it's *okay* for Black people today, none of whom were ever slaves and few of whom were subjected to Jim Crow, to murder innocent White people, none of whom were slavers and few who lived under Jim Crow?

    What karma? 3000 blacks lynched in 150 years. And those lynchings were carried out by the community on Blacks suspected of crimes on White people.

    40,000 Whites murdered by Blacks PER YEAR since deseg. And those Whites committed NO CRIMES against Blacks. The blacks did it to rob them, or just because they are White.

    Yan Shen, you make me understand why it is, cowards are called "yellow-bellied."

    ReplyDelete
  15. OT (not too far, though)

    Another classic from the BBC:

    Chinese immigrants to France attacked in Paris

    So who might be beating on Asians in Paris? If you're curious about that, you'll be disappointed by the BBC article, because they don't say.

    However, true to their stalwart -- or is Stalinist?, I can never get those two words straight -- tradition of politically correct reporting, here is their caption on a foto of a beaten Asian woman:

    Muggings are on the rise in districts of Paris that were models of multi-racial harmony until now

    Perhaps there's a clue there.

    (Oh, and often the Asian victims don't go to the police because they're in France illegally. I wonder if the BBC would have any suggestions vis-a-vis what to do about that?)

    @Yak Shit

    Didn't you ever hear that 'two wrongs don't make a right'? It was wrong to tolerate extra-judicial violence against Blacks in the past. And it is wrong for the media to do a 1984 in their reporting of Black on White violence today -- to underplay the fact of it, to completely bury the racial aspect of it. Maybe the above story will help convince you of that, since you're normally a pretty big ethnic grievance bleater.

    ReplyDelete
  16. These continual references by left wingers to lynching is similar to their references to the following:

    1) The Salem Witch Trials
    2) The Spanish Inquisition
    3) More people have died in the name of religion than anything else.

    Though innocent people did suffer, their focus on these events is way beyond their historical significance especially when compared to the body counts of numerous other events that never get mentioned like the French Revolution.

    If any of you are interested, please look up the body counts of the above items. I think you'd be amazed to learn how few actually were killed given the prominence of those events in history.

    ReplyDelete
  17. When did I condone the behavior of violent African Americans today? I merely suggested that karma sure can be a bitch. I find it somewhat ironic that after countless decades of white on black brutality being accepted, we now live in a society where black on white brutality is routinely underplayed.

    ReplyDelete
  18. These recent black flash mob attacks, which seem to be increasing in frequency, I think are the build up to another set of LA-style riots. These riots will be either later this summer or sometime next year.

    Blacks burn a city about every 10 years or so. Cincinnati was the last one to burn, which was in 2001. I recommend than any of you who live near heavy black populated areas to be careful.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "There is no equivalent in the 'old days' of the type of violence whites now have to endure at the hands of blacks."

    Well I don't know. Somehow I think that being enslaved and deprived of all rights as human beings surely is worse than what white Americans have to endure today from blacks...

    Now of course you have men like Cornelius Troost, who don't seem to consider blacks to be people in the first place...

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Anon at 9:35AM
    Planned Chaos?

    Unfortunately for that blogger, this isn't a new concept.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_T._Francis#Anarcho-tyranny

    ReplyDelete
  21. If you believe in racial karma, Yan Shen, I would gird my loins for the whole cruel subjugation of Tibet thing.

    Also, the "yellow supremacist" commenter's moronic burblings about "karma" remind me of something I noticed long ago: asians tend to be far more superstitious than whites. I recently read a story about chinese poeple protesting a hospice being built because they are afraid of ghosts and "bad fortune" from the dying. Article is here: http://www.ctvbc.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20110113/bc_ubc_hospice_110113?hub=BritishColumbiaHome

    ReplyDelete
  22. Well I don't know. Somehow I think that being enslaved and deprived of all rights as human beings surely is worse than what white Americans have to endure today from blacks...

    When did ANY white today enslave any blacks or deprive them of their rights? To describe this is "justice" or "karma" or "payback" is FUCKING ASININE. Those are things that happen to GUILTY people. The whites being attacked today are innocent of ANY crime against blacks, so unless you believe in eternal blood guilt, there is no "karmic payback" in operation today.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yan Shen said:

    Well I don't know. Somehow I think that being enslaved and deprived of all rights as human beings surely is worse than what white Americans have to endure today from blacks...


    Of course, Yan Shen forgot to tell us who it was that did the enslaving ... other Blacks and Arabs ...

    Then of course there is the whole Chinese experience with slavery and being on the doing side of that experience.

    ReplyDelete
  24. "Now of course you have men like Cornelius Troost, who don't seem to consider blacks to be people in the first place..."

    I don't consider you to be human. You are a subhuman troll. Why Mangan tolerates your bullshit is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  25. It's unbelievable that Yan Shen continues to try to downgrade 2011 black-on-everyone-else crime in America because of past historical injustices.

    As others have pointed out lynching had a definite number of victims and that in no way comes close to the annual cull incurred by blacks today.

    As for being enslaved and without rights, black Americans should start to riot on their African cousins for selling them into bondage. Maybe they can start with the newly arrived immigrants that are being used to diversify Maine and Minnesota.

    If past injustices are an excuse for present day lawlessness, then I fear everyone has something to worry about. Europeans were pretty much abused by everyone between the fall of Rome and up to 500 years ago. Whether it was the Moors, Turks, Mongolians or whoever, Europeans have many scores to settle too.

    I imagine there is a lot of payback destined for China too.

    So please Yan Shen stick to the facts about what is going on today. Remember blacks are terrorizing Asians too.

    ReplyDelete
  26. It is disingenuous of Yan Shen to point to those lynchings when given the greater criminality of the group the lynched came from they were likely lynched because of their criminal behavior.

    Perhaps Yan Shen should go live among them given his affection for them.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Yan Doofus, so blacks are raping and murdering because Whitey used to be so mean, right? So what did the Chinese do to them?

    Black attacks on Asians: racism or opportunity?

    The truth is blacks have to live under strict and occasionally harsh control like they used to in the South and in South Africa. Left to their own devices and moral codes, they revert back to the savage nature depicted in this country and in Haiti and all over Africa. And since victimology is so ingrained into their culture, it will only get worse.

    ReplyDelete
  28. When did I condone the behavior of violent African Americans today?

    Condone, excuse as in some way justified (e.g. by what was done to and by other people in the past), whatever -- that's the way I took it. And given the language you used:

    Like they say, karma sure can be a...

    That's the way most people would take it, because with those words that's the way it's meant, at least in part. And I think that's the way you meant it, in part.

    Like another commenter said: disingenuous.

    ReplyDelete
  29. "Somehow I think that being enslaved and deprived of all rights as human beings surely is worse than what white Americans have to endure today from blacks..."

    Nah. If Black multi-x great gramps hadn't been brought over, his progeny wouldn't be alive to prey upon White people today, people who never benefited from slavery.
    (Because he wouldn't have met multi-x gramma, or multi-x -1 gramps wouldn't have met multi-x -1 gramma, or multi-x -2 gramps wouldn't have met multi-x -2 gramma, etc.)

    So, really, today's blacks ought to be thanking their lucky stars to be given the chance to live in a first world country. Because had slavers NOT come, they'd be not alive, or, living in an African hellhole, as are today's Africans in Africa.

    To White HBD'er lurkers who like Asians: Please consider Yan Shen a typical example of East Asians and understand, THEY ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS.

    ReplyDelete
  30. "So, really, today's blacks ought to be thanking their lucky stars to be given the chance to live in a first world country"

    This kind of argument reminds me of a pimp who while beating a prostitute tells her to thank her lucky stars that she at least has food and shelter.

    ReplyDelete
  31. "This kind of argument reminds me of a pimp who while beating a prostitute tells her to thank her lucky stars that she at least has food and shelter."

    Nah. If the pimp offers to pay her way back home to her folks, and SHE WON'T GO, then, yeah, the hooker OUGHT to thank her lucky stars for food and shelter.

    Every. single. time any of us White folk tell Blacks, look, we'll pay your way back to Africa, there are NO TAKERS. (Proof they'd rather be here than an African hellhole.)

    ReplyDelete
  32. Dennis, do we really have to be subjected to Yak Shit (ht: eh)? Surely you don't need him to keep the comment threads "interesting."

    ReplyDelete
  33. Also, dipshit, us Whites alive today don't beat blacks. In fact, it's all we can do to get the justice system to help us when THEY beat US.
    (Read the post that started this thread you're crapping all over.)

    ReplyDelete
  34. "Yak Shit"

    Yes, thanks, eh, that was clever.

    This creep does talk a lot of shit, doesn't he?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Like they say, karma sure can be a...

    There is no time or place in the whole history of European and African coexistence on North American soil that Africans haven't had disproportionally high crime rates. You can go back to colonial days, South, North, West, pre-, during, and post-slavery, it is always the same.

    Here's a small sampling of statistics, just 1829 to 1938, but I can provide more:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/57359399/Historical-Criminal-Tables

    The crime of lynching (which targeted all races including Euros, as others have mentioned), insofar as it was directed at Africans, was often a panicked response to a phenomenon you should be no stranger to, the 'black crime wave.' It's happened often in our history, oddly (or not) at moments Africans feel newly empowered. One example would be Reconstruction, when the feds toddled on down south, installed legions of them in the State Houses (their appalling 'governance' there is strangely left out of Black History Month), and more or less told these Africans, 'It's your world now.' Many of them responded, as they always do on hearing these words, with violence-for-fun. Southern Euro-Americans responded in kind, and then some.

    Post-Civil Rights Act 'black crime wave'? Yes indeed, finally calmed somewhat by massive, long-term incarceration.

    Post-Obama 'black crime wave'? I don't know, have these random attacks lately been accompanied by Afro youth gangs shouting 'It's a black world, now', etc.?

    They have indeed.

    A response will come, no doubt, but with O. at the White House and Holder at Justice? I predict a longer, more violent slide, and a pushback the likes of which this country has not seen for many generations.


    This kind of argument reminds me of a pimp who while beating a prostitute tells her to thank her lucky stars that she at least has food and shelter.

    And yet it's exactly the argument made by Afro-American journalist Keith Richburg (who, unlike you, spent many years in Sub-Saharan Africa for the Washington Post) in his book 'Out of America.' Angered the 'community' enormously, but again, he's one of the few to have seen the current African reality up close. I'm sure he'd be happy to know you consider him a prostitute-beating pimp.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Slavery was (and is) a universal HUMAN institution. But the troll Yan Shen would have us believe that only whites deserve the bad 'karma' they are getting for having once participated in it.

    Yan Shen, you are full of more sh*t then a Christmas goose.

    ReplyDelete
  37. It's important that White people listen to what Yan Shen has to say. He is effectively stating that culpability for *immoral* actions are not just individually applied but collectively and, across time.

    We like to think, as Whites, that ownership of action applies to the individual and that collective responsibility, collective guilt, is a false concept deriving from pre-Enlightened times.

    That is obviously true, for us, but we need to acknowledge and understand that that is not how the real world works when it comes to group dynamics. Within White society we say mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa but the way race dynamics work is along the line of the blood libel, as in, let His blood be upon our shoulders, that is collective ownership of action.

    Obviously we must recant of the blood libel but there is no doubt that the blood libel is something inherent to all humans. One of the many reasons why racial preservation, segregation, and solidarity is of prime importance. No matter how seemingly benign and advantageous another group may appear like, say, having a high IQ, the fact remains that all human groups ultimately carry with them a group identity that will break down in a polyglot society and coalesce along those group lines when times of trouble begin.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Note how quickly and easily Yan Shen turns on Troost who has been Yan Shen's prime supporter and protector.

    All that high IQ solidarity is shown to be nothing but an advantageous grab for ethnic leverage on the part of Yan Shen which Troost unwisely, in his high IQ ways, falls for and urges us to fall for. For all Troost's belief in race blind meritocracy the favour is not returned.

    It reminds me of other high IQ types who also unwisely believe that their Zionism will put them in good stead. Intelligence without wisdom is surely a path to national ruin. Something that any idiot knows but probably can't articulate well enough when up against the convolutions of the high IQ who will talk themselves out of their own birth right, and us along with them.

    Yes, verily, it is good and right that Yan Shen speak, so that we may show our betters what they have done to us, for our betterment.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Dennis,

    As I've mentioned before, you have a great blog, one that is too good to be polluted by Yan Shen. He adds nothing of value to this blog; on the contrary, he detracts from discussion with his childish and trollish remarks.

    There are plenty of views represented by the rest of your audience, so there is no fear that the site will become an echo chamber if you launch the shithead.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Google ad on Craigslist says:

    Our global headquarters in Mountain View, fondly named the Googleplex, is a long way from our humble beginnings in a small garage in Menlo Park, CA. With Googlers hailing from every part of the globe, our campus in Mountain View is a diverse, creative and curious community.


    And yet, I suspect that there are very few Mexicans or Black in that diverse community.

    ReplyDelete
  41. As I've mentioned before, you have a great blog, one that is too good to be polluted by Yan Shen. He adds nothing of value to this blog; on the contrary, he detracts from discussion with his childish and trollish remarks.

    IIRC Dennis has said, in the context of dealing with a different troll, that he's not able to ban people outright. The most he can do is delete individual posts, which could ruin the flow of the comments section.

    I propose a novel solution for Yan Shan and his trolling: Every time Y.S. leaves one of his droppings in the comments section, I'll donate $10 to a charity that advocates restricting Asian immigration. Other commenters could give according to their budget. Potential recipients might include AmRen, NumbersUSA, the Center for Immigration Studies, and the VDare foundation. One could also give to restrictionist bloggers like Dennis or Steve Sailer via Paypal.

    It would disincent Y.S. from trolling here. And even if he stays, his presence would at least motivate us to do some good.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Yan Shen is a useful foil to all the Asian worshipping on HBD blogs. No 'IQ solidarity' - which is basically HBDer's own version of liberal creationism - instead we are shown the raw, anti-white, ethnocentrism that Asians really feel toward us.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yan Shen is a vivid (or pale?) example about the illusions of a "race blind meritocracy". Such a thing does not exist: there are only interests or conflicts of interests. "Race blind meritocracy" is the code name for a transitory period before a group takes the power in a society from another group. America of the 60s was called a "race blind meritocracy", but actually it was just a transitory period before white America and its society were replaced by multi-kult, AA, minority privilege and lobbies.

    Thus, Yan Shen will ask for a "race blind meritocracy" when he perceives that the interests of his ethnic/racial group are at stake, especially as long as white Americans are concerned; and then he will show the typical minority grudge claiming that whitey just "deserved" it and "karma is a b#tch".

    Listen, white America (or Europe): that's how the Game works. When you hear calls about a "race blind meritocracy", you are just a few minutes before replacement and demise, it's just that the opposing groups don't have enough power (for the moment) to take the lead. Then, your fairplay and honesty will be repaid with "karma is a b#tch". Pure meritocracy is a transient episode before ethnic nepotism.

    Nothing is race-blind or purely meritocratic in this world. You have the power or you don't. You have the upper hand or you are subordinate. You set your own rules or others will do it. As soon as they come to live among us, they learn that our Achilles' heel is our concept of universal morality or, in sports vocabulary, fairplay. We play by the rules, only to find after that that "karma is a b#tch". I'm afraid we'll learn this harsh truth when it's a little bit too late: "If I am not for myself, who will be for me?".

    ReplyDelete
  44. Every time Y.S. leaves one of his droppings in the comments section, I'll donate $10 to a charity that advocates restricting Asian immigration.... One could also give to restrictionist bloggers like Dennis or Steve Sailer via Paypal.

    Sounds pretty good to me!

    ReplyDelete
  45. Yet another bullshit thread centered around that Shen troll. C'mon, just how difficult is it to ignore him??? Simply stop replying and arguing with him and he, like most trolls, will go away. Even if he is so insane that he won't, not replying to him will still prevent comments from turning into yan shen-catalyzed cesspool.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Simply stop replying and arguing with him and he, like most trolls, will go away. Even if he is so insane that he won't, not replying to him will still prevent comments from turning into yan shen-catalyzed cesspool.

    I used to feel this way, but more and more I think Yan Shen serves a purpose. Some folks in the HBDosphere have misguided idea that Asian immigration would be beneficial for the U.S. -- a couple of Yan Shen's posts are enough to dispel that misconception. He make it very clear Asians and whites have clashing interests.

    Y.S. also shows the flaw of "cogntivie elitism," namely that it's a mask for ethnic self-interest. Finally, Y.S. tends to use the hypocritical, sleight-of-hand debating techniques that HBD denialists and "minority rights advocates" use in other venues. So sparring with him is good practice, even though you're right that it tends to derail threads.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Sounds pretty good to me!

    Just kicked you a hundred bucks. Yan Shen can decide how much more he wants me to send..

    ReplyDelete
  48. I used to feel this way, but more and more I think Yan Shen serves a purpose.

    Yeah, the same here. Following Yan Shen and a few others, I've been cured by the "high IQ Asians our allies and friends" stereotype that can be encountered in the HBD blogosphere.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dennis: don't mention it. I'd meant to donate for a while but was waiting for a holiday. Now I've had a chance to give early and become a "Yan Shen contributing member"!


    On the original topic: OneSTDV perceptively noted that the MSM are lashing out at Drudge for publicizing the black racist nature of the flash mobs. I suspect this is a sign of things to come. As the story becomes too big to ignore, they'll swtich tacks from ignoring the perps' race to shaming anyone who mentions it. If you point out that the thugs are black, you'll be labaled a racist, a bigot, "mean-spirited," "you're divisively encouraging stereotypes" etc. As the original post says, accusations of racism are the most potent weapon in their arsenal.

    This hysterical debating tack seems to popular with individual liberals too... as if they think the sheer force of their self-righteousness renders facts irrelevant.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous: "Our global headquarters in Mountain View, fondly named the Googleplex, is a long way from our humble beginnings in a small garage in Menlo Park, CA. With Googlers hailing from every part of the globe, our campus in Mountain View is a diverse, creative and curious community."

    And yet, I suspect that there are very few Mexicans or Black in that diverse community.


    Well, if you just check the U.S. Census Quickfacts website, you'll discover that Mountain View was about 21% Hispanic+Black in 2000. Given a decade of heavy immigration and the likely undercount of illegals, I'd guess the true figure today is something like 25%. And unless our friend "Anonymous" lives in Harlem, that doesn't seem like "very few" to me.

    People who just don't have a good grasp of regional demographics probably shouldn't rely on "suspicions"...

    ReplyDelete
  51. Re. Yak Dung, I stop reading and only skim the comments once he shows up. What a vile it.

    I for one want nothing to do with any race besides white. I don't care how high an IQ a non-white person has, they have no place in America. They are, in the end, parasites off of white people. Any HBDer claiming a few high IQ Chinese or dot Indians are a good thing are fools, just like liberterians who argue for open borders.

    I vote to ban/ignore/expel Yak Dung.

    MDR

    ReplyDelete
  52. "Anonymous said...

    It is disingenuous of Yan Shen to point to those lynchings when given the greater criminality of the group the lynched came from they were likely lynched because of their criminal behavior."

    Quite so. A lot of lynchings, of blacks and whites, though extra-judicial, was in the service of justice.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Well, RKU, you wanker, I live in Mountain View, and I was referring to those employed at Google.

    Specifically, I was referring to engineers, the employees Google is looking for..

    I would bet that there are very few black and Hispanic engineers at google, with the vast majority being White, Chinese and Indian (and in line with other employers in the Bay Area).

    The majority of Hispanics are likely janitors and cooks and so forth, with some in HR, and blacks are likely found in receiving, HR, and so forth.

    I know there are a lot of Hispanics in Mountain View, because I see them every day, but I don't see them at high-tech employers.

    ReplyDelete
  54. "Yan Shen said...

    I merely suggested that karma sure can be a bitch."

    In which case how many chinese will meet their karmic fate at the hands of other chinese? Since nobody has killed as many chinese as other chinese. As a chinese man, perhaps you should be wary of tiny women with deformed feet (another oh-so-civilized custom of your fatherland). It is no accident that the Chinese were widely viewed as perhaps the cruelest people on Earth, based on the bizarre and sadistic punishments they meted out to their own kind.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Matt Drudge certainly seems to be giving this issue some visibility (several similiar headlines all grouped together).

    ReplyDelete
  56. "For all Troost's belief in race blind meritocracy the favour is not returned."

    A finally devastating challenge to Troost, with gloves off, is here not permitted as that would destroy the function he serves of providing protective coloration for the implicit message of this blog - the advocacy of White racial interests - and show the explicit message of this blog - indeed, "race blind meritocracy" with means taken to blunt the impact of this on the White working class - as an unrealizable farce taken in the real world. In the real world, with things already progressed so far as to be now impossible from stopping them coming to their logical conclusion, there are only two possibilities for White racial interests to be served, and those are: White supremacist rule in the form of apartheid or hard racial separation.

    Now, that may make many go weak in the knees to hear, yet all with eyes to see know it to be true.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Just kicked you a hundred bucks. Yan Shen can decide how much more he wants me to send..

    You're not disincentivizing YS. Why should he care how much you give to Dennis? The thing to do is to reward Dennis every time he deletes a YS comment. That way, everyone's a winner! The blog is improved, Dennis is richer, and YS has less incentive to come back.

    ReplyDelete
  58. The idea that these events will soon lead to a tipping point in racial animosity and widespread violent conflict may very well be true, but it's naive to think that such events would then promote an end to the global, political and economic regime currently in power.

    On the contrary, thugs like "Thyeem Henrey" (as well as Islamic terrorists) might as well be hired; they are the attack dogs of the ruling class, working, like dogs, for handouts. Things that will destroy our quality of life, like the impending economic and currency collapse, black riots when their unemployment reaches 50% (they all work for the government) and the food stamp program ends, Somalian refugees (studying business administration in NYC) blowing up the subway system, etc. will be a godsend to the elite architects of it all, who are now much richer than they were pre-2008 crisis.

    An educated, homogeneous population with a normal family structure would never sit around and let the banker junta rape them and destroy the future of their posterity, but fortunately for them, we are and will be properly distracted. It will be all we can do just to protect ourselves from sub-hominids like "Thykeem Henrey," and to get away from the radius of a dirty bomb.

    Here'a a great financial blog by an even-handed writer that touches on politics. Talking about the current Greek crisis and credit default swaps, he writes:
    "A crisis [will] be put forward as an opportunity for the 'one-worlders' to once again promote their idea of a one world government, and a universal order of central financial authority that eventually and inevitably evolves into a single political system…
    For this to happen, national governments must be undermined and absorbed, their people brought down to their knees financially. And then their saviors can begin the work of ordering their lives."

    I'm not being pessimistic or saying this is inevitable, but it's important to know the true enemy, and his plans.

    ReplyDelete
  59. You're not disincentivizing YS. Why should he care how much you give to Dennis?

    Like I said, I gave to the blog because I'd planned to give anyway. And the original idea wasn't to give to Dennis in particular, but to any group that Y.S. would disagree with. There was a story in the WSJ a while ago about a liberal message board that was inundated with conservative trolls. They set up a program where regular members each gave $1 whenever a troll posted. They were able to raise a lot of money for their pet causes while also cutting down on the trolling. I thought it was a clever way to hit two birds with one stone and that it was worth mentioning.

    ReplyDelete
  60. In the climate of opinion that prevails in America, Europe, and associated cultures, it's a given that the truth about black on white violence will be suppressed. This 'duty to conceal', which the mass media operates, applies to virtually all information from which a reasonable person may infer that race and ethnicity are primary considerations in explaining a criminal act or 'crime waves'.

    We all know why this suppression of the truth is routine; and there's nothing we can do about it - for the present.

    Meanwhile, the internet in general and the blogosphere in particular supply the publicity and analysis which (on this topic) is most desirable. That's why I'm reading this discussion at the minute, and probably why you are too.

    ReplyDelete
  61. "It's unbelievable that Yan Shen continues to try to downgrade 2011 black-on-everyone-else crime in America because of past historical injustices."

    I'm not downplaying black violence at all. In fact, I've been one of the most outspoken people against black violence, whether it's been against whites, Asians, or whoever else. The main point I'm making here is that it seems kind of ridiculous to go from condemning these kinds of violent acts to a much larger and overarching complaint about how white Americans are suffering mightily at the hands of their African American counterparts and to even suggest that this black on white oppression today has no historical parallels.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Sniff:

    Pew. I thought I smelled Yak Shit.

    Okay, how much do we give Dennis per post-delete on him? And we need a note from him that that's what he did.

    I'll send to VDARE here, too:

    http://www.vdare.com/misc/110218_chinese_immigration.htm

    ReplyDelete
  63. Yan Shen said

    The main point I'm making here is that it seems kind of ridiculous to go from condemning these kinds of violent acts to a much larger and overarching complaint about how white Americans are suffering mightily at the hands of their African American counterparts and to even suggest that this black on white oppression today has no historical parallels.


    While it is clear, given their natures, that black wildings have occurred in the past, they were met with a greater measure of control in the past.

    For whatever reason, certain groups have fostered the impression that acts of frontier justice that occurred in the past were simply racist acts of violence while ignoring the rapes and murders that lead to such frontier justice.

    It now seems that plenty of whites (including those I talk to) are aware of the true average behavior of blacks compared with whites ... and your ridiculous and poorly constructed attempts to suggest that past white behavior is causative of current black behavior is known to be incorrect.

    It is all being stored up for the day when the fury can be unleashed. Just look to Roarke's Drift for an idea of what can happen.

    ReplyDelete
  64. "I'm not downplaying black violence at all. In fact, I've been one of the most outspoken people against black violence, whether it's been against whites, Asians, or whoever else"

    Nope. Too late. Despite all your smiling and bowing and scraping and denials, we all just saw the glint of the knife you're hiding behind your back.

    Thanks for that. I'll keep a link to this thread for future postings, so lurkers later on can see for themselves just how "beneficial" it is to us to have immigration of you "high IQ" East Asians.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I'm ambivalent about posts by non-White sickos like Yan Shen. On the one hand, it's obvious he hates Whites with a passion and is only here to troll. On the other hand, he shows the true face of Asian hatred to HBD-oriented Whites who have deluded themselves into thinking Asians are different. It is unfortunate so many Whites are determined to learn the hard way.

    ReplyDelete
  66. "..and to even suggest that this black on white oppression today has no historical parallels."


    That was addressed earlier in the thread. As is your wont, you ignored it. Liar.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Armance - thanks for another excellent comment.

    jmperry: excellent idea to donate to Dennis, but as emended let's make it every time he spares us the Asian supremacist's posts. I honestly hadn't even noticed the "donate" button on your site, Dennis - seriously, I just read! I just donated; sorry it was the first time but it won't be the last.

    ReplyDelete
  68. No two groups hate one another more than Koreans and blacks. As usual, blacks play the victim because first generation Koreans own businesses in black areas. They work hard, shoe off blacks trying to steal from them, and blacks respond with their What you be doin' here? We be the ones who should have the stores."

    Of course, the same is true of Vietnamese, many of whom open nail businesses and have scores of black customers, although the Vietnamese do try to open their establishments outside the black neighborhood. Black women do flock to just as black males flock to liquor stores.

    Question in the hood: "How come no bank be offering us money to open a business?"

    Answer: Ahhh, well, if it were up to the likes of Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, George Bush, Franklin Raines, et al, you would get anything you wanted. c

    ReplyDelete
  69. I've followed and (on rare occasions) contributed to this blog for a year or so. I thoroughly enjoy reading both Dennis' entries and most posts by regular contributors.

    I have to say though that the attitude towards Yan Shen increasingly reminds me of arguments individuals in kindergartens tend to be involved in.
    Let the gentleman speak and argue with him or ignore him if he's really such a nuisance to you.
    We'd all get more out of the discussions that develop on this blog if we didn't end up arguing about the pros and cons of Yan Shen's posts on such a regular basis.
    If I remember correctly, the headline of this blog entry reads 'Black Mobs and Carter Strange' after all.
    Kind regards from London,
    Wolf

    ReplyDelete
  70. Armance - thanks for another excellent comment.

    Sheila, I'm always glad and humbled by words of appreciation coming from you :)

    ReplyDelete
  71. Jim Jones: As I've mentioned before, you have a great blog, one that is too good to be polluted by Yan Shen. He adds nothing of value to this blog; on the contrary, he detracts from discussion with his childish and trollish remarks.

    His comments here don't detract if they're used, as Armance and some others do, for dispassionate analysis of the wide-spread, rancid anti-white attitude he represents. Other than that, act like white men, damn it, and stop allowing yourselves to be wound up by some dim little resentment-choked pissant with his silly head stuffed full of Grievance Studies twaddle. Ffs, people, it's been blindingly obvious for a long time that he's not here to argue in good faith. (He's like the gal in this video. Take home lesson: Don't argue with zombies.)

    ReplyDelete
  72. Blacks and their supporters always uphold the principle of collective blame and for all time, such as holding all whites responsible for slavery.
    When blacks do bad things then that line goes out the window; you're only supposed to hold the individual to account and not make blanket statements.
    When whites commit crimes there's no outpouring of sentiment for them from other whites, no white columnists rush to defend them. When blacks do something then the rationalizations and excuses really fly. That's the difference in mentality between the groups. Blacks are inherently incapable of being objective in any way; it's all tribal to them.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Chicago said...

    Blacks and their supporters always uphold the principle of collective blame and for all time, such as holding all whites responsible for slavery.


    Hmmm, there were free blacks in the old South who owned slaves, and it was blacks in Africa who were responsible for rounding up other blacks as slaves.

    Of course, King Charles and King James were also responsible for the Irish Slaves, and Oliver Cromwell carried it on, it seems.

    When blacks do bad things then that line goes out the window; you're only supposed to hold the individual to account and not make blanket statements.


    Actually, they also claim that it is because of their long-held memory of the bad things done to them during slavery, even for those blacks who are not descended from slaves :-)

    Note also, that it is claimed that much more savage things were done to the Irish slaves ...

    ReplyDelete
  74. Blogs like this are a good way to hone counter points to standard PC arguments. If a PC argument makes you angry then there's probably a double standard in it somewhere. Instead of getting angry - easier said than done maybe - point out the double standard.

    "In all fairness, white on black crime back in the old days, i.e. lynchings, etc, was tolerated for a great many years. Like they say, karma sure can be a..."

    If all white people are collectively responsible for every bad thing any individual white person did in history then it's only fair that all black people are collectively responsible for every bad thing any individual black person did.

    The same argument applies to every other ethnic group as well. They are all equally responsible for everything any of their ancestors did: Haiti, Detroit, Gulags, Tibet all the same principle.

    ReplyDelete
  75. "In an imaginary world where these things were honestly reported, what would the consequences be?"

    The whole post-war left-liberal world-structure is based on making white people feel they owe a debt for past sins.

    Given the sheer scale of black violent crime, white consent to the whole structure would collapse in no time. TPTB could still rule by coercion but it would have to be ope coercion rather than the current reluctant passive consent.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Some flyers for distribution:

    'STOP THE HATE TAKE A STAND AGAINST ANT-WHITE BIGOTRY AND VIOLENCE'

    http://jewamongyou.wordpress.com/2011/06/28/mivtsoyim-update-for-today/

    ReplyDelete
  77. Dear Sheila, I've sent you a separate email but I want to also thank you publicly for your donation, as well as for your valued commentary.

    Wolf: and regards from California. Always good to see you here.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Anonymous and kurt9 are correct,
    Bad times be comin'. Everyone had better watch their backs. If there is a black or blacks behind you cross the street...Jesse Jackson's advice.
    Arm up too. This can be done cheaply, simply and reliably. Stick a good folding knife in your pocket as well. Keeping a small emergency kit at work and in your car is advisable. If you live in a state that doesn't have BS "laws" regarding protecting yourself and your loved ones, carry a handgun. Nothing fancy required.
    I live in NNJ and for whatever it is worth, I have found that 12 gauge 00 buck is getting sold out on a regular basis at several stores. Please, whites should prepare, I urge you. If I can prepare for unpleasantries, anyone can.

    - LPP

    ReplyDelete
  79. I like how this woman says "there are animals at the beach today!" ... that was the only clue they were blacks. Note also she's not unattractive, but the freeze frame intentionally makes her look freakish

    ReplyDelete
  80. Did she just say they were defecating?! What filth.

    "There's a fight breaking out on the beach because there's nothing but animals covering this beach today," Schwartz phoned into the police. "What the hell is going on?"

    Schwartz said she was walking from Oak Street Beach toward North Avenue Beach on Memorial Day when she witnessed a woman being beaten by a gang of people on the beach.

    "They were being rude and abusive and throwing trash around and defecating," Schwartz said. "The crowd became very animated. They were cheering on the beating and more people joined in, so I kept walking forward. I was afraid I could be next."

    ReplyDelete
  81. Right, Mangan. You want the media "establishment" to specify the race of black thugs butchering whites. When you don't have the guts to specify the predominant Tribe in the black-coddling "establishment". Hint: it's that "J" word....

    ReplyDelete
  82. @CompassionateFascist

    "When you don't have the guts to.."

    Where's your site, tough guy?

    ReplyDelete
  83. This thread requires closing in song:

    "Never be rude to an Arab, an Israeli, or Saudi or Jew,
    Never be rude to an Irishman no matter what you do.

    Never poke fun at a Nigger, a Spic or a Wop or a Kraut,
    and never poke..."

    ReplyDelete
  84. I just returned from a funeral in New Jersey only to find a thread in which my name is used in vein more than a few times.Armance, Captainchaos,and others are upset over either my defense of Yan Shen or my advocacy of race-blind meritocacy.

    I agree that YS is a nuisance who probably despises whites and prefers yellow domination. However, he is indeed intelligent and sometimes basically correct. We should not censure him in any case. It is important to grasp the idea that frontier justice ruled the wild West and the South had its own version. Blacks were mistreated often and yet were also correctly punished in many cases. Justice was indeed rough and makeshift across the world throughout history. Remember Dostoevsky? Slavery was universal and tribal leaders were the chief villains.

    What we see today in black wildings are collections of hostile, unstable, highly aggressive kids whose dysfunctional families do not discipline them. There is no consistent discipline anywhere until the police point a gun at them. It is a theatre of the absurd. In groups their pathologies are reinforced. They are deadly vigilantes, brainless and powerful.

    The liberal media actually empower these kids because they are rarely condemned as the misfits they really are.However, Obama and his minions also exascerbate the problem with their "social justice" rhetoric and various soft-pedalling approaches to failure.Bill Cosby issued a scathing critique of Hip-Hop, for example, but he soon disappeared. Blacks are lost in a social milieu devoid of discipline they dearly require. Thus, the instincts so abundantly dangerous in tropical Africa are now incubating on the streets of America. It is a full blown disaster that we HBD'ers alone fully grasp, but naive Americans with working brains are starting to appreciate the serious threat of black violence. The heart of darkness I just observed in New Jersey reflects your deep concern with this phenomenon.I have to leave for an hour and will report on my NJ metaphysical revelations later.

    ReplyDelete
  85. and never poke..."

    ..."a maiden when her daddy's about!"

    ReplyDelete
  86. Back again. I visited my home state of New Jersey, a sojourn allowing quick visits to graves of my family,as well as my aunt's funeral. While it is contemplative and depressing, I also took time to do some field anthropology in the Newark, Hillside area where the primary funeral home was located.The landscape was deeply depressing.

    What I found in Hillside is the remains of a once almost luxurious community that is now inhabited by the worst urban transients I have seen. Blacks and various Hispanics now vie for space amidst a mostly upper-middle class area that was once wealthy and beautiful. Many homes look like 1,000,000 plus right now, but they are on a short chain. Kean University, a hotbed of "social reconstruction" sits there as NAMS students by the thousands undergo summer schooling we once called remediation.

    I saw the littering and general pathology of poor students and assorted "street people" simply meandering about aimlessly in what was a suburban paradise-mostly Jewish- only a decade ago. As I drove around I could sense the gradual urban decay around the edges and the overwhelming feeling that bad things must happen when the NAMS move into formerly white areas of wealth. The mismatch is painfully obvious. New Jersey has enclaves of Somalis and Guatemalans.This spreading cancer must make my wonderful state a wasteland of despair as the GDP descends and crime and disorder mount.In a very short time I saw the local police frisking tough-looking blacks who went bare-chested or with torn teeshirts.They looked very belligerent and the cops always approached with backup.Secondly, on one drive I saw a young black picking up an attractive Latino girl and fondling her in public. As I stoppped my car to help her, she looked at me and started laughing. She enjoyed the rough treatment! Newark and Hillside are now loaded with scum that will reduce its quality of life in a heartbeat. This incredible transformation is so advanced that I felt that perhaps our situation is hopeless. Many NJ residents, as in my hometown of Rahway, maintain their lovely homes with assiduous care but the long-term trend in not promising at all. The divisions in our society must grow.

    I don't know where the urban and sub-urban rich went but Iam sureit was westward toward PA.Shifting demographics in NJ spell future catastrophe.Chris Christy may cut the budget but he cannot repair the vast social problems posed by the violent, poor, and needy. These welfare masses must crush the great promise NJ once held for those wioth brains and ambition. For whites it isan unmitigated disaster.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Footnote: Those upset by my "race-blind meritocracy" idea are wailing about the very nature of American democracy before 1960. We had a full-blown meritocracy because performance was the main criterion of success. Blacks went only to black colleges but for an elite handful. Your grade was earned and some courses were devestating for those who failed. That was the good-ole-days.

    I only know that competing societies need meritocracies. No system is perfect but the brightest ought to be appropriately rewarded.Skin color should not affect academic status despite its association with IQ. Working whites with lower IQ's always settled for construction jobs and other blue-collar roles. This is part of life.There is no perfect solution but apartheid or complete segregation are unlikely to be real solutions even if segregation or removal is a perfect answer.It won't happen.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Cornelius Troost: "As I stoppped my car to help her..."

    Don't do that.

    I don't agree with everything you say, but I'd hate to read that something awful had happened to you.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Wandrin: "In an imaginary world where these things were honestly reported, what would the consequences be?"

    The whole post-war left-liberal world-structure is based on making white people feel they owe a debt for past sins.

    Given the sheer scale of black violent crime, white consent to the whole structure would collapse in no time. TPTB could still rule by coercion but it would have to be ope coercion rather than the current reluctant passive consent.


    Honest reporting would surely help, but I cannot help thinking that some of the more bureaucratically-minded liberals would still remain unmoved. They could be shown the details of tens of thousands of black-on-white violent crimes, and that would pale into insignificance in their minds beside, say, the Jim Crow laws. After all, they'd say, the former are just random acts by random individuals, while the latter is "institutional racism", which is oh-so-much worse. How do you reason with people like this?

    ReplyDelete
  90. If I may leap into the fray this late in the game, I would add that there is nothing more irritating to common sense than this insidious acronym 'NAM.' As a southern Californian, I am constantly confronted with the negative impacts of Asians - living habits repulsive to Whites and distinctly unAmerican, Vietnamese gangs and whorehouse coffee shops, rudeness and lack of grace in their business practices, etc. Speaking of fines, anyone who uses the acronym NAM should be fined...

    ReplyDelete
  91. Flash Mobs in Philly seem to be the same.

    BTW, while I have heard of those coffee shop whorehouses, not all Asians are like that ...

    ReplyDelete
  92. Troost: Those upset by my "race-blind meritocracy" idea are wailing about the very nature of American democracy before 1960.

    By "race-blind" do you mean blind to racism? America before 1960 was practically racially segregated wasn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  93. Cornelius: who the heck do you imagine is going to buy in to your concept of race-blind meritocracy? It is an idea only a White person could propose. Jews, East Asians and Indians don't operate that way.

    ReplyDelete
  94. For Anglo-Amerikan:
    You are right re our form of meritocracy before 1960. It was not race-blind in a broad sense because Southern universities were indeed absolutely segregated. Race was on page one of all applications and blacks surely had no chance. However, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,etc. all allowed very good blacks to attend. Because of lack of funds many chose not to attend. However, by no means was it a perfectly race-blind system. I should have qualified my claim. Thanks.

    For Lew,
    A real meritocracy is exactly what we have in high tech today. I was flabbergasted to see a group photo of Sun Microsystems-in color- showing an all white cast of employees with a few Asians in the stew.Brains count absolutely there and corporations must protect a meritocracy. But for the difficulties faced by blacks prior to 1960, the universities were entirely meritocratic in those days. I had many experiences that affirm my position. At Indiana University, for example, a physics prof flunked out half of all pre-meds. They were terrified of him. This was true across academia before it was captured by liberal fiat. Now the opposite exists where currticula are politicized and profs are often totally corrupt Leftists. Physics and math are the last frontiers of merit but one can circumvent them with Mickey0Mouse substitutes.Leftism distorts and lies 24/7.

    Jews generally favoir meritocracy. Of course they are aware of their IQ superiority so it is easier to befriend such a policy. However, regardless of your compunctions, merit is the only logical basis for university entrance. Any other device is essentially corrupt.Don't you want fair treatment?

    ReplyDelete
  95. Zx

    "Honest reporting would surely help, but I cannot help thinking that some of the more bureaucratically-minded liberals would still remain unmoved....How do you reason with people like this?"

    I think there are three blocs. A minority who are and always were predominantly ethno-centric. A minority who are predominantly ideal-centric. And a majority in the middle who are a mixture of both. I'd say the proportions are around 20/60/20.

    The media lock on the truth has kept the middle 60% sided with the liberal 20%.

    I think honest reporting would switch the middle 60% very rapidly - not just because of the scale of black crime but the nature of it.

    (If TPTB had decided hispanics were a better bet than blacks for what they want to achieve they still might be able to direct it in such a way that it solely effected blacks rather than more generally.)

    As to the liberal 20% themselves.

    - A lot of them don't know the truth. They come from safe all-white neighborhoods, go to mostly safe colleges, get safe jobs in the federal government paying enough to live in safe all-white neighborhoods. They'd go into shocked neutrality if the media told the truth.

    - Some would need "greater good" type arguments i.e. liberal race-realism e.g. no-one else on the planet gives a **** about saving whales and dolphins. Liberal race-realism would be a kind of charitable do-gooding ethno-state. As an ex-lineral i'd quite like that personally.

    - Some would need scientific race-realism. Group x are more violent because they a higher frequency of low impulse control.

    Basically a lot of the people who are liberals now would be race realists if the research that was underway hadn't been deliberately blocked by Boas and pals simply because a) those ideas would have been novel and b) an interesting mechanism for bossing people around or c) simply rational and scientific. A lot of them are anti-racism because they think it's irrational and stupid. Now in many examples that may be true but many aspects of it are entirely rational .

    But yes, there would be still be some. In most of those cases their left-liberalism or anti-racism is a religious belief and it would need to be undermined the same way someone is taken out of a cult. It could be done but only one-on-one somewhere. It would be like a hippy version of the inquisition.

    ReplyDelete
  96. For Lew,
    A real meritocracy is exactly what we have in high tech today. I was flabbergasted to see a group photo of Sun Microsystems-in color- showing an all white cast of employees with a few Asians in the stew.Brains count absolutely there and corporations must protect a meritocracy. But for the difficulties faced by blacks prior to 1960, the universities were entirely meritocratic in those days. I had many experiences that affirm my position. At Indiana University, for example, a physics prof flunked out half of all pre-meds. They were terrified of him. This was true across academia before it was captured by liberal fiat. Now the opposite exists where currticula are politicized and profs are often totally corrupt Leftists. Physics and math are the last frontiers of merit but one can circumvent them with Mickey0Mouse substitutes.Leftism distorts and lies 24/7.

    Jews generally favoir meritocracy. Of course they are aware of their IQ superiority so it is easier to befriend such a policy. However, regardless of your compunctions, merit is the only logical basis for university entrance. Any other device is essentially corrupt.Don't you want fair treatment?"

    You missed the entire point. Jews and Asians want us to judge them on merit, but they are unwilling to treat us the same way. Jews don't practice meritocracy when it comes to hiring people in Hollywood or in other mass media. The financial sector is similar. They favor their own people and discriminate against whites.

    Our highest value must be what is good for our people. You're insistence on putting universal moral imperatives on whites is a sure path to destruction when interacting with groups who practice no such thing.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Maybe these mobs will be a good thing. The left can't simply ignore all of the unemployed blacks as easily as they ignore unemployed, uneducated whites. And the connection between guest workers from Ukraine imported to work at supermarkets and unemployed 15 year old black males is obvious. Why aren't those kids working at the supermarket instead? I realize that poverty is rarely the explanation for violence, but it will be harder to ignore the effects of immigration when black yutes are rioting in the streets.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Carter's Civil Rights would have been violated, if he had any Civil Rights.

    ReplyDelete
  99. My criticism of you, Troost, is rooted in the obvious fact that you make so many banal and demonstrably false statements which no serious thinker could take seriously were he to trouble himself with thinking seriously.

    For instance, and only one of many that I have the patience to highlight:

    "Footnote: Those upset by my 'race-blind meritocracy' idea are wailing about the very nature of American democracy before 1960. We had a full-blown meritocracy because performance was the main criterion of success."

    Not so. I'm sure you will recall that prior to 1960 Ivy League universities put a cap on the percentage of Jews in the student body whom could be enrolled in those universities which was to be enforced even at the expense of merit taken in the abstract.

    That was the sane policy. Why? Because, ultimately, any unique expression of Life which does not privilege its own existence over that of competing forms of Life will be driven to extinction. This is self-evidently true, for if it were not, Life itself could not have been differentiated nor would Life, taken generally, have long existed anywhere. That, dear Dr. Troost, is The Foundational Metaphysical Principle, for all we will ever be concerned.

    In counseling as you do, you advise our willing submission to the destruction of our race.

    "There is no perfect solution but apartheid or complete segregation are unlikely to be real solutions even if segregation or removal is a perfect answer.It won't happen."

    What you really mean to say is that the prospect of preserving our race is hopeless so we should not burden ourselves with the pointless personal martyrdom which would result from objecting too loudly. Better to go quietly, then. Not very pretty when one actually comes out and says it, is it?

    ReplyDelete

Please post a civil and intelligent comment, preferably using a screen name other than "anonymous". Comments are not currently moderated and their publication does not imply the agreement of the blog's author.