The Inner Nature of the U.S.

Richard Spencer, after a discussion of the extent to which Russia is anti-PC and open to the possibility of systematic, genetic differences between races, writes:

Looking at the outcome of the 20th century from a Hegelian standpoint, one might suggest that it was America that was on the left—and the post-Lenin USSR, on the right—all along; tag lines like “capitalism” and “socialism” simply obfuscated the inner natures of each regime.

Whether Russia is simply behind America—and will soon follow it into cultural decadence—or is truly charting an independent course remains to be seen.

While I'm not sure whether anything can usefully be looked at from a Hegelian standpoint, Hegel having been one of the most deliberately obfuscating philosophers ever to have lived, Spencer's core idea here about the inner natures of Russia and America is an interesting one. In a couple of posts on this blog (American Diversity Outreach and Permanent Revolution), we've* tried to make the case that the U.S. comprises the locus for the spread of diversity, "democracy", and in general making the world safe for the project of the globalists. Other nations - such as in one of our examples, France - still have a residual, nearly reactionary sense of self, which various organs of the U.S. such as the State Department feel the need to break down. The globalist project of democracy and diversity, which effectively means the breaking down of Western nations plus one or two in the East, such as Japan, cannot succeed so long as some of these nations maintain a stubborn sense of self and of particularity.

So, what about the "inner natures" of Russia and the U.S.? It would appear that, despite many decades of Communism and dictatorial oppression, the Russians have maintained a robust sense of nation, and are not easily swayed by diversity propaganda, most of which appears to emanate from the U.S. government and the American media. Perhaps one of the reasons for Russia's nationalism is that it has benefited much less, or even harmed, by a globalized economy. The nations of North America and Western Europe have until recently been happy to go along with the globalist project so long as incomes were rising.

Can any nation, such as Russia, that reflexively opposes the policies of FedGov, be all bad? The debacles of American foreign intervention and the reasons for undertaking them, from Kosovo to Iraq and Afghanistan to Libya, as well as the strident calls for ever more immigration, demonstrate which nation is the source of global revolution, the imposition of diversity, and the deconstruction of Western peoples. It is our nation.

*Not the editorial "we", but a literal one which includes commenters.