Looking at population projections for Texas, demographer Steve Murdock concludes: "It's basically over for Anglos."Texans seem to want to fool themselves that their pro-business economic climate and abundant land mean that everything is alright. Politically, California is in many ways the opposite of Texas, with high taxes, and anti-business climate - but also with a fair amount of land - yet "Anglos" are on their way to becoming a minority here. As the demographer says, he's "worried" that, leaving aside everything else, 30% of the labor force won't even have a high school diploma.
Two of every three Texas children are now non-Anglo and the trend line will become even more pronounced in the future, said Murdock, former U.S. Census Bureau director and now director of the Hobby Center for the Study of Texas at Rice University.
Today's Texas population can be divided into two groups, he said. One is an old and aging Anglo and the other is young and minority. Between 2000 and 2040, the state's public school enrollment will see a 15 percent decline in Anglo children while Hispanic children will make up a 213 percent increase, he said. [...]
By 2040, only 20 percent of the state's public school enrollment will be Anglo, he said. Last year, non-Hispanic white children made up 33.3 percent of the state's 4.8 million public school enrollment. [...]
Unless the trend line changes, 30 percent of the state's labor force will not have even a high school diploma by 2040, he said. And the average household income will be about $6,500 lower than it was in 2000. That figure is not inflation adjusted so it will be worse than what it sounds.
"It's a terrible situation that you are in. I am worried," Murdock said.
Most of the state's population growth is natural, Murdock told the House Mexican American Legislative Caucus today.Sounds to me like Texas needs House White American Caucus pronto. For all the good it would do; they'd probably spend most of their time proclaiming their love of diversity and/or apologizing for the Alamo.
What is to be done? At this point, damned little.
I live in Texas and I can tell you that everywhere you go you see young hispanic families. I'm talking guys in there late teens and early twenties with a wife and kids, yes with an s plural. You almost never see a young white woman with kids. Think about it, if they have 3 kids in there 20s, and white women have 1.8 kids by there 30s, this will mean that not only are they having more kids but actually faster and then there kids will repeat the cycle.
ReplyDeleteIt's difficult to identify the exact point at which a country dies, but I'm going to call last year - the first year in which more non-white babies were born than white ones - the official time of death of America.
ReplyDeleteI basicly agree with the cluelessness of the Republicans in this matter. They seem to believe that low taxes and less regulations will keep Texas rich forever. The correct formula is high IQ population + free markets -> prosperity. Some of the free market advocacy is even a bit overrated, countries like Sweden, Singapore, China, Japan and Norway perform economically quite well despite them having high taxes and lots of regulation. Why, oh why?
ReplyDeleteI have read that Hispanic-Anglo relations are better in Texas than in California, because of relatively greater cultural similarities. Maybe Anglos in Texas don't feel that Mexicans are as different from them as Arab or Chinese immigrants would be -- from a Anglo-Texan PoV.
I bet that when things will get worse in Texas Hispanic population growth would drop, but mainly because they will move on to more prosperous US states -- and who could blame them?
Mr. Mangan nailed it by saying: " what will be done ? Damn little !".
ReplyDeleteThe West is in a terminal phase. White women are supposed to focus on themselves and their all important careers. And White men, well they can go sit in a ditch someplace and contemplate their fate.
The demographic tsunami has hit and there isn't any stopping it.
The American Southwest is going to be Mexican, and as much as many people don't like it, you better get used to it.
For all the brave talk that emanates from race realists, no one and I mean NO NONE in this country is about to start the systematic removal of millions of illegal immigrants. And even if you could, you would still have many millions of Hispanics who are here legally.
They reproduce younger and in higher numbers, and most whites are so paralyzed that I don't see that reality changing anytime soon.
The question is how do the tiny minority of ethnically proud whites deal with this.
The 1st thing is to start having kids. It's a very simple solution. But it's a solution that many white Americans, wallowing as they do in narcissism and various forms of self pity and neurotic self analysis, cannot seem to fathom.
I mean, you know man, I just can't handle the responsibility ( I've heard this many times).
I have 1 son, and will most likely have 1 more child.
If this simple solution is too much for most whites to handle, then we don't deserve to survive. Or at least the white race as we have known it for the past 2000 years will cease to exist.
Europeans who have the will to reproduce and raise strong and sensible kids will recede to remote corners of our former empires and sow the seeds for a renewal of our people and cultures at some unspecified future time.
Ultimately the US is going to become some kind of a Latin American country. Anglo traditions and institutions will slow the decay and ameliorate it. In my mind the worst Latin American country by some margin is Mexico- it seems to combine the worst aspects of North American and Latin American culture. Maybe the US will avoid that, but the problem may be that it won't have any real Latino business or middle class. The only Latin American country that seems like a decent place to live is Chile, but it is thinly populated and has good natural resources.
ReplyDeleteI predict Texas will eventually be majority Euro again, but it will be people who look like this:
ReplyDeletehttp://tinyurl.com/4dkq3nb
The marxists triumphed after all -western civilization was destroyed.
ReplyDeleteI don't get the appendage about high school diplomas. Seems entirely superfluous to the main point. It's better that a rabidly anti-white majority has diplomas?
ReplyDeleteThe term "Anglo" is ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteHow is it accurate to describe Americans of Polish, Italian, Scandinavian, Russian, or even Irish descent as "Anglo?"
They really mean "American" - pre-1965 American that is. C'mon, at least use the word white.
We are not "Anglo!"
Adding insult to injury, Mexicans in the U.S. have more children than Mexicans in Mexico - so we're subsidizing (thru welfare, etc.) their proliferation.
ReplyDelete"It's difficult to identify the exact point at which a country dies, but I'm going to call last year - the first year in which more non-white babies were born than white ones - the official time of death of America."
ReplyDeleteMajority white America, isn't dead, but it probably soon will be as most white Americans are unwilling to encourage majority non-white states like Mexico to leave the union.
Dennis,
ReplyDeletethis is an excellent thread. My understanding is that it is rare for a white Texan who lives in a nearly all white neighborhood to decide that the neighborhood is too boring, sell his house and move to a more urban setting where he rubs shoulders with NAMs. In this sense, I think that white Texans have a world view consistent with the paleo - o - sphere.
Here in the Los Angeles area I see some behaviour that is different -
I see large numbers of whites in their 30's settling in areas that contain plenty of NAMs
Let me be clear, these are middle aged people that grew up in all white neighborhoods like Malibu, Westlake Village, Hidden Hills Lake Sherwood, etc who have decided that life in the all white neighborhoods is too boring and who have instead decided to settle in Venice.
Dennis, when you get to Los Angeles, how much time do you spend on Abbott Kinney or other parts of Venice? Venice and the Marina and Redondo and many other places are filled with whites who can afford to live anywhere that they want who have chosen to live in these neighborhoods even though there are plenty of NAMs
Dennis I think the massive decline in crime in some "mixed" areas of LA has led many whites to consider it as a home, whites who never would have considered it in the past.
So, yes in some places in America like Texas whites are moving to exurban whiteopias. However it seems that in some other places in America, like DC, NYC, LA, Chicago whites who grew up in all white neighborhoods are moving in very large numbers to mixed neighborhoods since the mixed neighborhoods have more urban coolness.
I don't think this is discussed much here in the paleo - o - sphere because almost by definition, a paleo conservative is someone who IF HE CAN AFFORD IT will always choose an all white neighborhood over a neighborhood that has some nams living in it - so stories about large numbers of whites actually moving TO mixed neighborhoods just don't ring true to most of us here.
That being said, can you share what is happening in the Bay Area? My sense is that plenty of towns in Marin are nearly all white.
Dennis do you see whites who grew up in all white Marin towns decide that those towns are not interesting enough and vow to not live in those towns and instead move to more racially mixed neighborhoods in San Francisco?
My sense is that this happens a lot more in the LA area than in your neck of the woods but please let us know
Well, as long as the premises of all debates will start with nonwhites being citizens and voters and with that status as unchallenged, then yes, Texas is lost. And I'm not sure if it shouldn't be this way anyway.
ReplyDeleteI tried for years to tell whites that nonwhites will not "carry the torch" of western civilization. Why would they? Who thinks they would care about Latin and Greek, the midieval Church, the Goths, the Franks, the Kings of England, or the history of Australia, Prussia, Holland, the Magna Carta, the Pilgrims, the Declaration and the Constitution, etc.? What moron thinks that nonwhites would appreciate and preserve the memory of someone else's ancestors?
ReplyDeleteLike the stupid party they are, the RedTeam eagerly courted Mexicans for short-term political gain. They didn't mind a flood of millions of these supposed conservatives, "so long as they were legal." Never mind that it was clear for years that Mexicans, like blacks and jews, are mostly Dem voters.
Millions of racial laws and policies are still stacked us, the new racial minority in our own country, and conservatives don't give a flip. Thanks to their liberalism, we have lost it all, and we must start over.
I'm a Texan also. Its one thing for you to read about this stuff, but I'm living it. If you want a glimpse into the future of America, come visit us down here. There is nowhere to run anymore. There are some SWPL refugees living in the exurbs and driving 2 hours a day to avoid the brown masses, but they'll soon be overwhelmed. I still find it humorous that these self-righteous SWPLs talk about their open-mindedness, but are the very last people you will see in places frequented by brown people. I guess its easier to commute 2 hours a day than admit that there could be a problem.
ReplyDeleteAmerica officially sucks.
ReplyDeleteI would like to see a survey of whites asking them: is it a good thing that whites will be a minority? I'll bet half won't even care.
Yes, at some point Anglo's will have to organize, it's just a question of when, things are still in trivial stages though, such as "Former Majority Association for Equality" designed to raise scholarships for European American males.
ReplyDeleteThis hits home - thus my long comment.
ReplyDeleteWe have spent thousands of dollars that we can ill afford sending our children to private schools: partly because we want them to have a Christian/traditionalist worldview, partly because we want them to be decently educated (with such old fashioned things as phonics and the multiplication tables), partly because we want them to be taught a (mostly) accurate history of their country, and partly to allow them to spend at least some of their time among other Whites. I know of no private schools, whatever their cost (and we can't handle the top-tier ones financially) that are all White. Because the schools are Christian, one cannot be an open ethno-nationalist. My younger child's current school is perhaps 55-60% White, but the minority share is spread among various ethnicities, and his grade and class at least is about 85% White.
In contrast, our neighborhood elementary school was perhaps 65% White years ago, when I first considered (and then rejected) it for my older son. It is now perhaps 35% White. The students are almost all Chinese and Indian, with a smattering of blacks and Mexicans. A few years ago I saw a young Arab girl there (4th or 5th grade) with a head covering, being picked up by her mother/grandmother (couldn't tell) in full mummy attire. Young White children are an endangered species here in North Texas. I always make a particular point to smile at young White mothers with White children, and let them precede me in line at the store. When forced by economic necessity to visit Walmart, I see hordes of Mexicans with multiple children, loads of Indians with the same, and Chinese with their own particularly ugly type of infant (I swear, almost every child I saw during my years in Singapore was hideous looking).
The upshot of all of this is that Texas, like California before it, is dying. Both states are previews of what is to come for the rest of what used to be America. We could stop all immigration, legal and illegal, tomorrow, and it would change nothing. Only massive deportation (both officially enforced and self-motivated) would make a dent, and even then would have to include millions of technical "Americans" of various origins.
I see no real hope for any real change. Far too few are willing to face reality, far too few have the will to do what would have to be done. I see a truly dim future for my children, and really cannot bear looking beyond them to what sort of country/world their children might have to endure.
I thought conservative, religious whites were supposed to still have a decent fertility rate. What gives?
ReplyDeleteAs taxes rise in blue states, is it plausible that working age whites would move to red states like Texas?
ReplyDeleteAlso, would reducing social benefits make the lower end of society less of a drag on society because they could not survive long term on the dole?
States like New York allow people to qualify for Medicaid at 200% of the poverty line, while Texas residents don't qualify till 60% of the poverty line. So, how does that affect the fiscal health of the state. I guess I am wondering how much fiscal conservatism can mitigate immigration and its attendant problems.
I saw the article and with the dread touch of truth knew it to be so. I've recently relocated to west Texas (which is, confusingly, to the north of north Texas) in order to escape Houston and Harris County. I hasten to point out that I did so with my three daughters (spanning ages 1-11), and my wife.
ReplyDeleteWe celebrated a birthday party for my eldest daughter today at a local establishment. The place was thronged with mestizos and blacks, and leavened with a few whites.
It's commentary on our times that I feel the need to point out that I don't hate blacks, mestizos, or Arabs, or Jews, or men from Mars (nor yet women from Venus) as individuals. There are fine and upstanding people of every race blah blah blah and I judge each man as to how he relates to me.
With that said, however, I longed for a more tapioca appearance, a more white-bread, a more rice-like, texture to my fellow revelers.
I was born into an America that was super-majority (i.e., 66 2/3%)---if not more--white, and I didn't see too much wrong with it. I don't see too much wrong with it.
Allow me to rephrase that: I like an America that is super-majority white. I want an America that is super-majority white.
I have defined my mission in life as raising my children up properly, so that they can go forth and carry on our lineage, in the 13th Warrior sense of "lo, there do I see my father . . . ." I am (reasonably) intelligent, (reasonably) moral, (reasonably) educated. I want, for my children, a (reasonably) decent life, such as America has provided for a couple hundred years.
I am your average east Texas Celtic mutt, with some leavening of English. I am, if you will, Albion's seed, with ancestry including English, Irish and Scots. I have, in the past, admired our form of government and thought it worthy.
I do not object to, and indeed, in the past, have thought it worthwhile, that our society has a certain leavening of outlanders, but rather think that they should be seasonings, rather than the main dish. A dash of curry, say, can make a chili all the tastier. A dash. A dash. A dash.
I read, this morning, the article Dennis links to. My immediate reaction was "That's because we haven't played cowboys and Mexicans yet." My secondary reaction was to reach for a bottle of wine.
When I was a child, the "Lost Cause" was the Confederacy. I wonder what it will be for my children, or my children's children?
What I have never quite understood is the tendency of whites to run rather than stand their ground. It even has a term - "white flight." How come you never hear about "black flight" or "brown flight"?
ReplyDeleteSeveral years ago I talked to a white woman who had fled to the suburbs. She was complaining that her current suburb was becoming "diverse," with gangs and other such problems. But there was a solution: she had found a peaceful (white) suburb to move to, which was even farther out!
At some point there won't be anywhere left to run. At that point, having lost the cities, the suburbs, and maybe even the small towns, will white people finally make a stand?
"Think about it, if they have 3 kids in there 20s, and white women have 1.8 kids by there 30s, this will mean that not only are they having more kids but actually faster and then there kids will repeat the cycle."
ReplyDeleteThis is all very well, but consider the costs of education. On the one hand, you have the situation when with modern medical care, an individual child has excellent chances of survival. On the other hand, a family with an average income cannot afford to give high quality educational opportunities (good school, sports, private music lessons, etc...) to more than one child. How rational is it for parents who want the next generation to succeed to raise a family of four children, so that these children go to a bad public school, will not be able to have any extracurricular activities, and will end up with low paying jobs? Should these families raise the slave class for the well-off? It will be hard to convince to do so the smart middle-class K-strategists.
How is it accurate to describe Americans of Polish, Italian, Scandinavian, Russian, or even Irish descent as "Anglo?"
ReplyDeleteDidn't Brian Sykes report that even the English themselves have only a relatively small genetic component from the Angles proper and the Saxons?
As taxes rise in blue states, is it plausible that working age whites would move to red states like Texas?
ReplyDeleteI think so, but whites and blacks are not migrating as much as Hispanics. I also wonder if high taxes are a big deal to young people who rent. Illinois has outrageous property taxes, but if you can't afford a house anyway why do you care? So the overall economy and loss of jobs in blue states would force white migration, and high taxes contribute to this, but high taxes are not the proximate cause of young, white out-migration.
Also, would reducing social benefits make the lower end of society less of a drag on society because they could not survive long term on the dole?
In theory yes--in practice no. The problem is the collapse of monogamy. What do you do with all the kids of single mothers? If we end welfare then mom has to work, but that means the kids go somewhere. We would need to institutionalize children on a massive scale. We are often tempted to think that we can turn back the clock to 1952 by changing laws and regulations back to 1952 laws and regulations, but the society has changed.
States like New York allow people to qualify for Medicaid at 200% of the poverty line, while Texas residents don't qualify till 60% of the poverty line. So, how does that affect the fiscal health of the state. I guess I am wondering how much fiscal conservatism can mitigate immigration and its attendant problems.
Medicaid is a huge drain on state budgets. A lot of that money actually goes to elderly white nursing home residents who have met spend down requirements by liquidating their net worth. I don't think fiscal conservatism can help much although I'd love to be wrong. The migration pattern is that NAM men move to where the jobs are. (Nebraska, Texas, wherever) They form first generation NAM families that do fairly well, but their kids grow up with American culture and do not form intact families. Illegitimacy and welfare dependence plagues succeeding NAM generations until the economy is destroyed in that region. Mix, stir, and repeat.
From a geographic and demographic perspective, Texas might be the worst positioned state in the union: it's where the largely black South meets the soon-to-be-majority-Mexican Southwest. Interestingly, despite their historical, political and cultural differences, the white majorities in both Texas and California only lasted from about the 1840s to the 1990s. So I guess Davy Crockett, Jim Bowie and the rest of the Alamo defenders died for nothing, eh?
ReplyDeleteWe all know that Texas is a minority-majority state, so learning that white kids are only a one-third minority there isn't a big surprise. But the demographer does bring up a couple of important points about the state's projected education levels and per capita incomes declining drastically. He should have also mentioned that rates of crime and corruption will almost certainly go way up, and that Texas will follow California's political trajectory by flipping from being a Republican stronghold to a Democratic bastion.
So what is to be done? That's easy: LEAVE. Texas is already finished as a white-majority state and will soon be finished as a conservative state, so white Texans will eventually emulate their brethren in California and start moving elsewhere in large numbers. Call it the U-Haul solution to the population replacement problem. Where should they go? Well, they could start with neighbouring Oklahoma, which is 71.3% non-Hispanic white compared with 47.2% in Texas, and continue north from there. The pattern of white flight from the cities to the suburbs that began in the mid-20th century will continue on a large scale in the 21st, this time from the southern tier states to northern and middle America. We run, they follow, rinse and repeat.
The United States of America, the nation that brought forth the arms and men that crushed the Japanese empire in four furious days (June 4 -7, 1941) and humbled the Prussian scientists of war twice within thirty years, America, brought low not by hundreds of Soviet armoured divisions and their commissars, brought low by a million brown, dusty feet trudging North, not all at once, not under any flag or command, just steadily, and a million again, and again, and now this.
ReplyDeleteHow is it accurate to describe Americans of Polish, Italian, Scandinavian, Russian, or even Irish descent as "Anglo?"
ReplyDeleteIt's about as accurate as describing the people in and from Central and South America as "Hispanic".
"I tried for years to tell whites that nonwhites will not "carry the torch" of western civilization. Why would they? Who thinks they would care about Latin and Greek, the midieval Church, the Goths, the Franks, the Kings of England, or the history of Australia, Prussia, Holland, the Magna Carta, the Pilgrims, the Declaration and the Constitution, etc.? What moron thinks that nonwhites would appreciate and preserve the memory of someone else's ancestors?"
ReplyDeleteWhat percentage of whites in this country know more then a few words of Latin or Greek? What percentage would even know the first thing about the Goths or Franks? Hell, most whites in this country know next to nothing about their own country, unless that includes popular culture and sports.
Whites in the US stopped "carrying the torch" for western civilization some time ago.
I do agree that NAMs care even less about the things you listed then whites.
Mexicans are rather friendly towards Anglos and there is an established modus vivendi between the two neighboring ethnic groups. So the situation is not so dramatic as Mangan presents it. But surely being a minority will weight increasingly on Texan Anglos, not only culturally but also social and economically. And of course, politics will be based on race and being in minority, Anglos will find themselves ruled by Mexican politicians. In time, if the demographic trend continues, Anglos's may lose their country as did South African whites. It is not good to be an ethnic minority. It is a very difficult issue, I cannot think of good solutions nor even a wise comment.
ReplyDeleteContrary to what the politicians expect, Mexicans will not assimilate to American culture except on a superficial level. Nor will Americans assimilate to Mexican culture. Mexicans frequently don't bother to become fluent in English, and Anglos hardly ever bother to learn Spanish. Furthermore, Mexicans seem to be almost completely endogamous.
ReplyDeleteThe lower sorts of both groups emulate Black ghetto culture, but this is their only commonality.
Btw, Anglo has always been a common synonym for White in Texas. Texas was conquered by people who thought of themselves as Anglo-Saxons, and most of the Whites who moved here were Anglos from the former Confederacy. Germans, Czechs, and other Europeans settled in relatively small areas where they had little impact on the culture of the state, and they slowly assimilated to the Anglo majority as the cities sucked up the rural population. Russians, Irish, Italians, Jews, Orientals, etc. had virtually no presence at all in this state until the 1980's.
We urgently need a constitutional amendment setting forth the means by which a state or league of states can legally, peacefully secede. Otherwise there is nothing to do but to watch the tide rolling through Texas and California continue through the rest of the states.
ReplyDelete"Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteAmerica officially sucks.
I would like to see a survey of whites asking them: is it a good thing that whites will be a minority? I'll bet half won't even care."
Most likely answer: "You must be a racist for even asking such a question."
I have read that Hispanic-Anglo relations are better in Texas than in California
ReplyDeleteAs a New Yorker who has spent only a minute or two in Texas (at conventions), I've never been able to get a reading on the white Texan's mentality. I had always assumed that they possessed a sense of oneness as white Americans, and that if there were any serious social interaction with Mexicans, it was more likely to be among Californians. I was shocked some years ago to learn that the white men of Texas intermarry in greater numbers with Mexican women than do white Californians.
What Anglo children? Thanks to Papa, will there be any Anglo children left? It looks like white men are taking Fred Reed's advice.
"Rick Darby said...
ReplyDeleteWe urgently need a constitutional amendment setting forth the means by which a state or league of states can legally, peacefully secede. Otherwise there is nothing to do but to watch the tide rolling through Texas and California continue through the rest of the states."
According to some thinking, no such amendment is required. The Constitution is a contract - the contract by which the several states agree to the terms of union with one another. It is the document which "constitutes" the union, hence the name. If the federal government fails to execute its responsibilities under this contract - by, for example, failing to enforce the law (DOMA, immigration laws), neglecting to protect the border (immigration again), gross violations of the Bill of Rights (TSA, BATF, etc.), stealing property from it's citizens and giving it to others (the bank bailout, etc.) - and does so in a persistent and willfull manner, then one could argue that the contract is voided. And consequently, so is the union.
Of course, the feds would never admit this.
'Most likely answer: "You must be a racist for even asking such a question." '
ReplyDeleteYep, our indoctrination has been most thorough. And our ignorance and stupidity seem adamantine.
"When forced by economic necessity to visit Walmart, I see hordes of Mexicans with multiple children, loads of Indians with the same, and Chinese with their own particularly ugly type of infant (I swear, almost every child I saw during my years in Singapore was hideous looking)."
ReplyDeleteLoads of Indians and Chinese with infants? Really? Both groups have fertility rates *LOWER* than those of white people. This is a good example of confirmation bias by the statistically illiterate.
"What percentage of whites in this country know more then a few words of Latin or Greek? What percentage would even know the first thing about the Goths or Franks? Hell, most whites in this country know next to nothing about their own country, unless that includes popular culture and sports.
ReplyDeleteWhites in the US stopped "carrying the torch" for western civilization some time ago."
Yep. This is a good place to start (teaching our own history/mythology) the reconstruction effort, for those whites who care. Homeschooling is a perfect way to do it.
Last year, non-Hispanic white children made up 33.3 percent of the state's 4.8 million public school enrollment.
ReplyDeleteA very high percentage of white children in Texas attend private schools--maybe 20%. Also we are getting some white immigration because of job opportunities and and low housing costs. Granted, we need to convince Texas politicians to stop selling out Americans to the cheap labor lobby, but the situation here is not hopeless.
"Loads of Indians and Chinese with infants? Really? Both groups have fertility rates *LOWER* than those of white people. This is a good example of confirmation bias by the statistically illiterate."
ReplyDeleteWhat makes you think Walmart shoppers are a random sample of Indians and Chinese?
"How is it accurate to describe Americans of Polish, Italian, Scandinavian, Russian, or even Irish descent as "Anglo?""
ReplyDeleteIt's not meant to be accurate, it's meant to be flattering.
"We urgently need a constitutional amendment setting forth the means by which a state or league of states can legally, peacefully secede. Otherwise there is nothing to do but to watch the tide rolling through Texas and California continue through the rest of the states."
ReplyDeleteThere is little chance of that constitutional amendment happening. Not that that would stop the break-up of the US. And I have little worry of federal forces actually doing anything to prevent the break-up. There will be threats, speeches and some theatrics with military gear, but that is about it. This however does not mean that Civil War II will not be bloody.
- LTSF
What might save Texas would be complete elimination of welfare and affirmative action programs.
ReplyDeleteThe Mexican government of the early 19th century invited Anglos to settle in Texas because their own people as settlers could not deal with the commanches/apaches/etc.
"Majority white America, isn't dead, but it probably soon will be as most white Americans are unwilling to encourage majority non-white states like Mexico to leave the union."
ReplyDeleteSorry I meant Texas. As other posters have pointed out Texas is now acting as the primary entry point for Hispanic immigrants and soon it might be best if Texas wasn't part of the US.
Ultimately if white opposition to mass immigration becomes strong enough Texas and southern California could end up becoming an independent buffer country, a free enterprise zone if you like, which soaks up Hispanic immigration without it spreading to the rest of the US. Let the mutli-nationals have their cheap labour and open border in this part of North America but don't let it spread any further.
Martin B,
ReplyDeleteThe question of the right to secede was settled decisively some time ago, at Appomattox Court House.
The question of the right to secede was settled decisively some time ago, at Appomattox Court House.
ReplyDeleteU.S. Grant is no longer with us.
"What makes you think Walmart shoppers are a random sample of Indians and Chinese?"
ReplyDeleteWhat makes you think the use of the word "loads" is accurate when describing the number Indian-American/Chinese-American children seen at Walmart, given the low TFR that both these populations have?
Martin B @ 10:54,
ReplyDeleteYou are right. The Constitution was "sold" to the original states on the basis that it was a contract limiting the powers of the national government to specified tasks, that everything else was down to the states, and that the states could opt out if the federal government exceeded its mandate.
Obviously, that is no longer the understanding in Washington. Through fictional interpretations of the "interstate commerce" clause, our federal overlords now believe they can control anything.
So we must have a constitutional amendment spelling out the means of separation so clearly and unambiguously that even the imperial federal judiciary can find no way of overturning it.
Rob @ 1:40,
No political question is settled permanently by force of arms. That includes northern triumphalism from a century and a half ago.
I really hate responding to individuals who don't have the personal integrity to post under anything but "anonymous," where I post under my name and stand by my statements. I made/make no claim regarding Indian and Chinese birthrates in America overall. In my area of Texas, however, the Indian and Chinese populations are growing rapidly, both through immigration and birth. I know of at least three large, formerly White churches with a five mile radius that were sold to Chinese congregations in the last few years (and the feng shui practitioners promptly had the roofs and doors repainted red). My neighborhood schools are heavily Indian/Pakistani/Chinese. I have never yet seen a Chinese mother or couple, either at a public school or Walmart or anywhere else in public, with fewer than two children; many have three and four. They usually travel with grandparents in tow. I have walked out of stores (Walmart, and other grocery stores as well) when I've found Chinese tour buses in the parking lot - yes, they come with their cameras to stand around and gawk at the Whites doing their grocery shopping, and to check out neighborhoods to move into. If we ever have the wherewithal to move, I could not in good conscience sell my house to Whites.
ReplyDeleteRegardless of official birthrates and/or statistics, I am stating conditions on the ground in my area, an officially "conservative" and economically-prosperous northern suburb of Dallas. Whites are already a minority here, but not to Hispanics. Whites move into the suburbs further north, east, and south, constantly fleeing (our Indian neighbors moved here from a suburb further south, which was "the" place to be 25 years ago - until the Indians and Hispanics took it over and the Whites moved away. They'll follow Whites to the next "good school district" and Whites will again move on. Obviously, this cannot continue indefinitely, but most refuse to recognize reality.
George Bush and Jeb Bush apparently think this is great. It might lead to Jeb's son being elected president someday. National Review even put Jeb on the cover recently, obviously attempting to build a little momentum for a potential third Bush run at the White House.
ReplyDeleteDo you folks see why I seize on the private school/busing issue so adamantly? Wealthy conservatives and SWPLS would not be for the migration policies they are for if their own children had to go to gang-infested/bully-culture public schools. They are for these migratory policies when they can evade this, but since their lives are seldom interrupted by it much, the cheaper labor makes it worth it.
Nations where private schools become de riguer for elites will see elites who are willing to "trade up" on their own populaces in the name of cheaper labor, every time. The elite don't care folks, their share-ownership in our largest corporations is legally guaranteed. The peasants aren't going to surround their mansions with pitchforks and demand that they dispense their dividend payments from their numbered accounts, or revoke their own kids' trust-funds, which were set up as soon as they were born. Not gonna happen. M
This was in today's Seattle Times:“More than three-fourths of Washington's adults — but just 61 percent of its kids — are white, the Census Bureau reported.”
ReplyDelete“Nearly 19 percent of all children in the state are Latino now, up from fewer than 12 percent a decade ago. Children of color now make up a majority of the under-18 population in five counties — Adams, Franklin, Grant, Okanogan and Yakima.”
Those (rural) counties are already enjoying the vibrancy diversity brings.
“An increasingly diverse young population poses both opportunities and challenges...”
Not to worry, there's a plan:
“Schools need to focus more attention on preparing children from a dizzying assortment of cultural backgrounds for a new generation of jobs, so high-tech employers don't need to import highly skilled workers from overseas...
Governments and social-service agencies need to work harder at outreach...”
"I really hate responding to individuals who don't have the personal integrity to post under anything but "anonymous""
ReplyDeleteThat is amusing. Does posting under the name "Sheila" give you any added incentive to show any integrity or intellectual honesty? Your track record doesn't really indicate that, and I call BS on your claims in this very post.
"I have never yet seen a Chinese mother or couple, either at a public school or Walmart or anywhere else in public, with fewer than two children; many have three and four."
Really? *Never*? I've worked with innumerable Chinese while I was part of various engineering teams and can't recollect anyone having more than 2 kids. That's also what the statistics bear out, which is why my anecdote seems more plausible than yours. Both our data-sets are eventually anecdotal and need to be discarded, but I strongly sense that you're being either intellectually dishonest or are indulging in subconscious confirmation biases.
"They'll follow Whites to the next "good school district".."
Indians and Chinese populations, when present in large enough numbers, MAKE for good districts. They don't need to "follow" Whites to good school districts. Again borne out by statistics. Being a WN is all fine, but let statistics not be sacrificed at the altar of any political agenda. This just makes WNs look suspect.
Meanwhile our attention has been directed towards for the past decade - and continues to be directed towards - "radical Islamists," Shariah Law, "Islamo-fascism," Jihad, Islamic fundamentalism, etc.
ReplyDeleteMexicans are one thing.
ReplyDeleteIn the recent past, I've flown from London to Dallas several times. On each occasion the plane was half full of Indians. And they weren't tourists: they either lived there or were coming to visit relatives.
What's missing from the comments is Yan Shen informing us that if all these immigrants were Chinese there'd be nothing to worry about. In fact we ought to be grateful.
Loads of Indians and Chinese with infants? Really? Both groups have fertility rates *LOWER* than those of white people. This is a good example of confirmation bias by the statistically illiterate.
ReplyDeleteI actually think Asian Americans, as a group, currently have higher fertility rates - they're younger, if nothing else. Maybe its just all the Filipinos that are popping out sprogs, however.
As for the term Anglo, I wouldn't be concerned about arranging deck chairs on the Titanic. It's rather beyond me why White/European Americans would use a term which I have only seen used pejoratively by Mexicans to describe themselves, however.
Sheila said...I really hate responding to individuals who don't have the personal integrity to post under anything but "anonymous..."
ReplyDeleteIt's not as if you are using your full name, now. Is it, anonymous Sheila?
According to the census: as of the 2010, the racial distribution in Texas is as follows: 3.8% are Asian American, 0.7% are American Indian, .1% are Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Alone, 2.7% are Two or More Races, and 10.5% of Some Other Race Alone. Hispanics (of any race) are 37.6%, while Non-Hispanic Whites are 32.8%.
It would surprise me to encounter many Chinese with more than two children. The average Chinese household size is 3.8, but it may be different where you live, and among Wal-Mart shoppers. I don't shop there, so my ignorance may show.
Secession is nonsense. Expulsion of the majority population is unfeasible. Living in permanent ethnic conflict is not recommendable. What remains? Assimilation. The Brazilian solution. Texas Anglos should strive to assimilate the Mexican population. Mexican must learn English, Spanish should be discouraged, Spanish surnames should be anglicized, intermarriage should be promoted and celebrated. Bigotry and discrimination should be combatted. Most Mexicans are culturally already half assimilated, and already fully assimilated in the religious aspect, having left Catholicism behind and are members of Protestant churches. The alternative is ethnic conflict, which would weaken the country.
ReplyDelete"Rob said...
ReplyDeleteMartin B,
The question of the right to secede was settled decisively some time ago, at Appomattox Court House."
No such question was ever answered. THe Union did not proove that no such right existed, anymore than a man "proves" his wife to be a bad spouse by beating her. The decisive application of force only proves that one side is more powerful than the other. And as Mr. Darby pointed out, nothing is ever really settled.
J @ 4:51,
ReplyDeleteYou've got The Wrong Stuff.
You think "secession is nonsense." Expulsion of your hoped-for "majority" of non-whites is "impossible." What's left? Ah, yes, assimilation.
Funny, but blacks have been here since the 17th century and still have their own culture. Mexicans have been here almost that long, and they're a little slow off the mark in assimilating. What miracle is going to get this assimilation lark moving?
Spanish surnames anglicized? "Mexicans learn English" -- what's been stopping them all these years from learning to speak English beyond phrases used in routine transactions?
It is possible to assimilate a small exogenous culture into a majority culture, assuming the foreign culture wants to be assimilated. It is not possible to assimilate dozens of vastly different minority cultures that together make a majority. All you get is a splintered, dysfunctional pseudo-country.
Brazil as a model? You can't be serious.
"The Brazilian solution."
ReplyDeleteThe Brazilian "solution?" A corrupt, violent, two-tiered society where the Europeanized overclass lives behind walls and funds bread and circuses for the vast, dysgenic underclass at the gates?
That solution?
I have never yet seen a Chinese mother or couple, either at a public school or Walmart or anywhere else in public, with fewer than two children; many have three and four.
ReplyDeleteReally? I don't know what's going on in Texas, but I have never known a Chinese family with more than two children. East Indians might go up to three, but they, too, normally stop at two children, especially if they already have a boy and girl.
The Brazilian solution. Texas Anglos should strive to assimilate the Mexican population. ... intermarriage should be promoted and celebrated.
ReplyDeleteAre you just being facetious, or are you trying to make some people on this list vomit? And shouldn't it be called the Obama Solution?
The alternative is ethnic conflict, which would weaken the country.
ReplyDeleteWeakened, eh? That's the most clueless comment I've seen yet. Being half Hispanic is going to weaken the country so if America being weakened is something which concerns you, you should have been a "WN" all along.
But the so-called America of today is not a entity I feel any loyalty to.
J: Secession is nonsense. Expulsion of the majority population is unfeasible. Living in permanent ethnic conflict is not recommendable. What remains? Assimilation. The Brazilian solution. Texas Anglos should strive to assimilate the Mexican population. Mexican must learn English, [blah blah blah].
ReplyDeleteThe majority makes the culture. And in case you haven't noticed, Pollyanna, the anti-assimilation forces have won and are now calling all the shots. See horse, barn door.
I don't know why people get so bent out of shape at the word "secession". It's not like we have a nation anymore. No, I don't think there's going to be any formal secession - the biggest "rebellion" will be electing some lying RINO the MSM doesn't like. But in time the center won't hold, things will gradually fall apart, and new entities will arise. Or maybe you'll get a Brazil North. But some new polity in a splintered and re-assembled North America would likely be a better place for my descendants than a Brazil, so I don't know why I'm supposed to be so mortified at the very thought of break-up in any guise, and cheered by brazilianization.
The alternative is ethnic conflict, which would weaken the country.
What is this country of which you speak? I don't give a crap about Brazil North. Why in blue blazes should I care if some political entity, which does nothing to preserve and advance the interests of "myself and my posterity", nay, actively works against those interests, is weakened? Look, no sane person wishes ethnic conflict or, God forbid, civil war on himself or anyone. But I'm not the one who so short-sightedly set up these easily avoidable conditions of conflict. So don't come looking to me for some no-return-on-investment "solution" if the SHTF.
Sheila: I really hate responding to individuals who don't have the personal integrity to post under anything but "anonymous..."
ReplyDeleteIt's not about integrity. People have perfectly respectable reasons for not using their names. Using "anonymous" rather than an equally opaque pseudonym, however, is lazy and pointlessly annoying to other readers. (Instead of allowing myself to be annoyed, I've adopted the habit of taking all "anonymouses" on a site to be the same person, which sometimes makes them very entertainingly angry when you attribute somebody else's opinions or arguments to them. But if they can't be arsed to distinguish themselves, I'm not going to be arsed to try to distinguish them.)
""I really hate responding to individuals who don't have the personal integrity to post under anything but "anonymous""
ReplyDeleteThat is amusing. Does posting under the name "Sheila" give you any added incentive to show any integrity or intellectual honesty? Your track record doesn't really indicate that, and I call BS on your claims in this very post."
Actually it does. Posting anonymously especially while attacking somebody else's post is cowardly and gutless. Picking an pseudonym is the least you can do.
The order of integrity goes:
Posting under your real name (first and last) > Posting under your real name (partial) > Posting under a pseudonym >> Posting anonymously.
Sheila was clear in her statement that her observations were based on her own experience and was ancedotal.
"Indians and Chinese populations, when present in large enough numbers, MAKE for good districts. They don't need to "follow" Whites to good school districts. Again borne out by statistics. Being a WN is all fine, but let statistics not be sacrificed at the altar of any political agenda. This just makes WNs look suspect."
The asiaphilia and aspie dorkiness of the writing makes it sound like a kurt9 post.
Nations where private schools become de riguer for elites will see elites who are willing to "trade up" on their own populaces in the name of cheaper labor, every time.
ReplyDeleteYep, and nothing new. The eternal "cheap labor lobby" has been pursuing its goal hammer and tongs since before the founding of the Republic, starting with the slave-owners. Countervailing forces sometimes kept it in check, holding the line here, conceding there. But a people who've lost any real sense of nationhood no longer have any defense against that lobby, which has finally emerged triumphant in the U.S.. (As it will in the UK, Canada, and the rest of the Anglosphere, too). Looking back, it will be seen that a quite brief period of massive immigration, pushed to make population replacement a fait accompli, effected the final victory. I wish 'em joy of it.
The sole reason I post under only my Christian name is to protect my children from the sort of censorious, condescending, supercilious liberals typified by the comments of the brave "anonymous" and "mpresley." Your reading comprehension could stand some improvement, as well as your commenting style (Well, I'll make allowances for anonymous; Asians typically speak/write English in a stilted and unnatural manner). Cite all the official statistics you wish regarding the various ethnicities in Texas overall. As I've already stated clearly in two separate comments, in my county Asians and Indians are a significant percent of the population and, combined with the Arabs, Mexicans, and blacks,will soon outnumber the Whites. The only reason this has not yet shown up electorally is because so few of them are citizens yet (although there has been an Indian and/or Chinese candidate for the school board for each of the last few elections).
ReplyDeleteYesterday's "Dallas Morning News" featured a celebratory front-page article about the increasing number of blacks moving to the North Texas suburbs (I could have told you this without the Census results; when we first moved here we rarely saw a black; now they are everywhere). They are all presented as "middle class" and looking for good schools. I grew up in the D.C. suburbs, and remember back when we considered the people from Prince George's County poor Whites. Then all those "middle class" blacks from D.C. looking for good schools moved down Georgia avenue; now PG county is a black slum with typically sky-high rates of black dysfunction. One North Texan politician, a Haitian-born black who the DWLs elected to their City Council, noted that in 15-20 years, this area will look "drastically different than the way it looks now." Yes, all the Whites will be gone, the Asians will follow the fleeing Whites, and the downward spiral will go on ad infinitum.
My Texas county's White population grew by 32% in the past decade, but its black grew by 178%, the Hispanics by 128%, and the Asians by 157%. In the last ten years, my county's White population has dropped from 75 to 63% (it was easily closer to 85% when we first arrived here). Oh gee, but "mpresley" tells me only 3.8% of Texans are Asians, and "anonymous" proudly declares that Indians and Asians "MAKE" for good school districts. Isn't it strange, then, that somehow before they all arrived, the local schools were considered excellent?. So sorry, I must be "intellectually dishonest" or living in an alternate reality. Actually, I'm living through the "looking glass" (an English cultural reference I wouldn't expect you to understand) and your very presence at an HBD/White nationalist blog is evidence of this.
I really hate responding to individuals who don't have the personal integrity to post under anything but "anonymous..."
ReplyDeleteI agree. These people are annoying and want to be free to make all sorts of contradictory arguments without being called on them. The comments section would be unusable if we all called ourselves "Anonymous".
Obviously I prefer non-anonymous comments. Unfortunately, comment settings on Blogger allow either everyone to comment whether as "anonymous" or with a screen name, or only registered users with Google or other accounts. Given how many commenters are reluctant to register, for now at least I'm choosing to let anyone comment. I reserve the right to reject comments labeled "anonymous".
ReplyDelete"Btw, Anglo has always been a common synonym for White in Texas"
ReplyDeleteNo, it hasn't. I grew up in Texas and never heard the term. The term they would have used to describe themselves was "white." "Anglo" is a euphemism among Mexicans for "Gringo" which is just a little too racist to use in public, particularly to your victims who are not quite subdued. It was adopted by the Left (and the press they have totalitarian control over) in part from racial correctness, but in part for the same reason that Mexicans use it - using the blunt term "white" highlights the racial aspect of the conflict, just as gringo would. Most whites would never think of themselves as Anglos, and aren't descended from Anglo-Saxons. It's a psychological divide and conquer strategy.
"It's about as accurate as describing the people in and from Central and South America as 'Hispanic'."
A closer analogy would be describing all Central and South Americans as Mexes or PRs, and describing whites in America as European, or perhaps, Europeanish.
"The question of the right to secede was settled decisively some time ago, at Appomattox Court House."
And the borders of the U.S. were settled an even longer time ago with The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Go figure.
"No, it hasn't. I grew up in Texas and never heard the term. The term they would have used to describe themselves was "white.""
ReplyDeleteI grew up in Texas also and I did hear the term, and not from Mexicans or Leftists. White was a much more common word in everyday use, but Anglo was used by the historian T.R. Fehrenbach and other intellectuals and historians for a long time. They were basically synonyms.
"Most whites would never think of themselves as Anglos, and aren't descended from Anglo-Saxons. It's a psychological divide and conquer strategy."
As of 1980, the overwhelming majority of Texans were of British descent. Their culture was Anglo-Saxon, their surnames were English and Welsh, their accents could be traced back to various regions of Great Britain. If the average Texan didn't often use the word Anglo, or think of himself as Anglo-Saxon, it was because he was so thoroughly immersed in an Anglo culture that he simply had no frame of reference. But his instinctive feeling that Whites derived from Southern and Eastern European stock were different is made evident in the slur "Yankee", which carried secondary ethnic overtones in addition to the primary regional connotation.
There were Czechs, Germans, Cajuns, and Scandinavians in Texas but they were small in number and concentrated in certain geographic areas, and thus never had a big impact on the culture.
I sometimes post as anonymous because some folks do not just evaluate comments based on the content, rather they react to their opinion of the person making the comment. I really like discussing ideas and tire of the discussion getting focused on who is making the argument. I agree it is easier to follow conversations when folks use a consistent screen name but anonymity also has some advantage as well.
ReplyDeleteFormal secession may or may not happen. Much more likely is the country fracturing along ethnic-cultural-linguistic fault lines, leading to some sort of eventual dissolution.
ReplyDeleteThe funny thing is, it could be a peaceful sort of "who gives a shit anymore" affair, or it could a violent spasm.
That said, if a southwest dominated by Mexicans makes a move to separate itself from the rest, then it will be peaceful. No president - especially not a Republican - is going to touch that. OTOH, if it's Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming making a move to leave, you can be almost guaranteed that force will be used.
"The question of the right to secede was settled decisively some time ago, at Appomattox Court House."
ReplyDeleteAnd the borders of the U.S. were settled an even longer time ago with The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Go figure.
Touché.
Secession is nonsense. Expulsion of the majority population is unfeasible. Living in permanent ethnic conflict is not recommendable. What remains? Assimilation. The Brazilian solution. Texas Anglos should strive to assimilate the Mexican population. Mexican must learn English, Spanish should be discouraged, Spanish surnames should be anglicized, intermarriage should be promoted and celebrated. Bigotry and discrimination should be combatted. Most Mexicans are culturally already half assimilated, and already fully assimilated in the religious aspect, having left Catholicism behind and are members of Protestant churches. The alternative is ethnic conflict, which would weaken the country.
ReplyDeleteYou sound just like your co-ethnic Sarkozy who has promoted "métissage" i.e. crossbreeding for France:
http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2008/12/mtissage-now-its-obligation.html
I'm sure it's just a coincidence....
Promoting this (whether called "assimilation" or "métissage") is a good strategy for Jews since it reduces the relatedness coefficient of the population and thus altruism of the population, making Jewish in-group altruism that much of a greater relative strength.
Secession is nonsense. Expulsion of the majority population is unfeasible. Living in permanent ethnic conflict is not recommendable.
ReplyDeleteIsrael has lived and does live like this. Why don't you think others can?
For all you ethno-nationalists. I have a party for you. The American Third Position Party. www.american3p.org.
ReplyDeleteAlso there is no hispanic/latino ethnicity. Near 85% of mexico is Amerindian, they are basically just native mesoamericans. The mestizo myth has been blown a long time ago. There is perhaps 5% mestizo and the other 10% is White Europeans who form the elite. Just look at their presidents.
January, 1921... The secretary of the Rural Land Owners' Association in Texas stated:
ReplyDelete"This is all I desire to say, gentlemen, that the future welfare of that section of the state is absolutely dependent upon the use of Mexican labor. If our farmers are deprived of the privilege of bringing in this Mexican labor at times when they need it, the agricultural development of that section of the country will be absolutely done for."1
America, Nation or Confusion: A Study of Our Immigration Problems
"From 1926 to 1930, the House and Senate Immigration Committees held hearings on
ReplyDeleteclosing the back door. The usual Grantians (Richards M Bradley, Roy L. Garis, Francis
H. Kinnicutt, Demarest Lloyd, James H. Patten, and John B. Trevor) testified, and Harry
H. Laughlin submitted another one of his special reports, showing that ''Mexican immigrants
are making a reconquest of the Southwest/*99
Naturally, many of the same groups that testified in 1924 against European restriction
also showed up to oppose Mexican restriction, including, as the Immigration Restriction
League put it, "racial zealots ... of Hebrew origin" whose "racial interests and
prejudices warp their judgment as to the general interest." But unlike in 1924, the Jews
were joined this time by a well-organized and well-funded coalition of sugar beet manufacturers,
livestock representatives, produce farmers, railroad executives, and mining interests,
who put up a formidable fight in Congress. Few of them denied that the Mexicans
were racially inferior, but they all testified that further restrictions would result in economic
disaster for the Southwest. And besides, they wanted Congress to understand that
the Mexicans were "timid" workers who always "knew their place" and were willing to
work "all day or night and the next day without ever making a kick." Certainly the
"wetbacks" were less dangerous to society than the Negroes. The head of the American
Cattle Raiser's Association, for instance, told the Senate that he always let his three
daughters ride the range with Mexicans, and the girls were "just as safe as if they had been
with me.... Do you suppose we would send them out with a bunch of negroes? We
would never think of such a thing." 100
Patrician Racist: The Evolution of Madison Grant
by
Jonathan Peter Spiro
B.A. (University of California, Los Angeles) 1982
MA. (Pepperdine University) 1994
"Texas Anglos should strive to assimilate the Mexican population. Mexican must learn English"
ReplyDeleteMore like the reverse. Texas Hispanics should strive to assimilate the Anglo population. Anglos must learn Spanish.
"OTOH, if it's Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming making a move to leave, you can be almost guaranteed that force will be used."
ReplyDeleteAs I said, if something like that goes down, there will be talk. Lots of it, but only talk. The idea that force will be used (and used effectively) is part of the scam that those who are running things are desperate about keeping alive. Plan accordingly...
- LTSF
A consistent screen name certainly aids in sorting out who wrote what. As to posting under one's real name.....well, there's a reason so many of us wish to remain anonymous. We are not all as brave as Dennis is. The things we write here could conceivably be used against us. Imagine that you get called up on some racial grievance at work. Who's to say that some judge would not approve a plaintiff's motion to subpoena records of your private web-traffic. I'm not aware of this having happened yet. Then again, the supreme court had never ruled that a city government was entitled to evict it's residents and replace them with better and richer ones........until they did.
ReplyDelete"For all the brave talk that emanates from race realists, no one and I mean NO NONE in this country is about to start the systematic removal of millions of illegal immigrants. And even if you could, you would still have many millions of Hispanics who are here legally."
ReplyDeleteWhat are you babbling about? Lots of people support the total removal of all illegal aliens and would do just about anything to make it happen. What if the government put a bounty on them? You don't think they would be rounded up real quick? Not everyone is weak like you. The average street cop would be more than happy to arrest every illegal they saw if they were allowed to, let alone rewarded for it.
"The asiaphilia and aspie dorkiness of the writing makes it sound like a kurt9 post."
There are a ton of weirdos like that on the "HBD" blogs. It's gets hard to tell the autistic white computer nerds from the Asians themselves sometimes.
It's good to see the Israeli perspective on white America is that we should surrender our country and cease to exist as a people. We'll keep that in mind when the question of your people's and country's well being comes up.
"Secession is nonsense. Expulsion of the majority population is unfeasible. Living in permanent ethnic conflict is not recommendable. What remains?"
ReplyDeleteHow about:
"The Domination of the Draka" option; or
"Captain Trips"?
J, you realize that there's also the solution of ruling over them as a minority, right? It's not like people who aren't of European descent have to vote, you know?
ReplyDelete"Caleo said...
ReplyDeleteFor all the brave talk that emanates from race realists, no one and I mean NO NONE in this country is about to start the systematic removal of millions of illegal immigrants."
Nonsense - Eisenhower did it. His administration rounded up and deported nearly a million illegal aliens. Many more left of their own accord.
"And even if you could, you would still have many millions of Hispanics who are here legally."
Legal, Schmegal. The law can be changed according to "evolving standards of decency". I learned that from the Supreme Court.
Remove hedonistic pleasures, strengthen discipline, and you remove fear. The ancient Spartans controlled a Helot population many times their number for a very long time; Romans conquered the world through strong discipline; poor early Americans defeated the savage Indians and conquered the world even more spectacularly than the Romans. Jews are over half of the richest and most powerful people in the world, according to Vanity Fair and the Jerusalem Post, yet they are a tiny minority.
ReplyDeleteOnly faith and the will to win are lacking. Your children and grandchildren are still waiting for most of you (95%+) to get off your lazy arses, quit bitching, shut off the sports channel, and do something. The possibilities are endless because every institution has been corrupted and needs to be infiltrated and fixed or replaced.
The person was talking in the present tense, so referring to a man who was POTUS in the 1950s doesn't do a thing to disprove the point.
ReplyDelete"Obviously I prefer non-anonymous comments. Unfortunately, comment settings on Blogger allow either everyone to comment whether as "anonymous" or with a screen name, or only registered users with Google or other accounts. Given how many commenters are reluctant to register, for now at least I'm choosing to let anyone comment. I reserve the right to reject comments labeled "anonymous".
ReplyDeleteWhy not setup a site like Half Sigma's then? Is it too expensive? Anonymous comments don't bother me. I comment at Half's with a name because he makes people, but here I don't. Most comments blur together for me anyway whether someone has a screen name or not.
In terms of integrity you'll probably get what people really think if they aren't using their real name when commenting on controversial subjects. If you ask someone that is sitting in front of you if they have cheated on their wife will they tell you? Probably not. But in an anonymous survey they will be more likely to admit it.
I comment at Half's with a name because he makes people, but here I don't.
ReplyDeleteSeriously? You have time to hang out on blogs and post comments, but you're just too time-strapped to type in "Joe Blow" after making a selection on the "choose an identity" menu? (I'm assuming that selecting the third, rather than the last, choice doesn't constitute an insurmountable cognitive challenge for anybody here.)
Or are there really a bunch of people who haven't figured out that you don't have to register to use a pseudonym here? Or maybe people believe that the "Anonymous" button contains a magical true anonymizing service? Seriously, I don't get it.
"What remains? Assimilation. The Brazilian solution. Texas Anglos should strive to assimilate the Mexican population. Mexican must learn English, Spanish should be discouraged, Spanish surnames should be anglicized, intermarriage should be promoted and celebrated."
ReplyDelete*yawn*
Of course this Jew's "solution" is to accept, nay, encourage the mongrelization genocide of our race. Really, who could have seen that coming?
Hey Dennis, they released the 2010 Census and you may want to change the title to California Anglos Crushed because it shows they lost nearly 1 million whites over the last decade, in comparsion Texas gained several hundred thousand - no doub many of them fleeing California.
ReplyDeletehttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703662804576189031330152462.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Please inform me it labored right? I dont want to sumit it once more if i should not have to! Either the weblog glitced out or i am an idiot, the second option doesnt shock me lol. thanks for an amazing blog! Anyway, in my language, there are usually not a lot good supply like this.
ReplyDeleteWell with mass immigration from white people of other states we are pretty safe to say Texas unlike California is much better off. Texas being more pro business attracts more young white college graduates. With the new immigration bill we have Texas looks like it will survive, but if we falter and do not keep strong Texas will be lost
ReplyDeleteThis talk is quite disturbing to say the least. My father, is "Anglo", of irish decent, roots in Texas before it was a state in the union. My mother is of hispanic decent. Born and raised in Texas, along with her 11 other siblings. For some reason, people label us " mexican". Again, all born in texas. If someone born in this state had a german name, are they german? They are american.
ReplyDeleteMy grandfather did come here from Mexico as an infant. Became a US citizen. Married my grandmother, a "Vasquez ", who was a 5th generation Texan, an American, born and raised. All 12 children finished high school, and furthered their education. They were never on welfare, worked the fields, grew their own food, and were often times the only "non-white" family living in a "white " neighborhood. The kids were usually the only hispanic kids in school.
My parents married, and had me. My father, "anglo", as everyone seems to refer, brown hair, crystal blue eyes, fair skin. Mother, thick black hair, high cheek bones, olive complexion, resembles what we call American or Native American Indian. She was a tall woman in that era. She stood 5'8, her father (from mexico) stood over 6'0, as did my seven uncles. I was born with a mixture of both cultures. I resemble more my fathers famiy with one exception. I have my mothers skin tone. I stand 5'10, slender. Build, both traits inherited from MY MOTHER. My name is very "southern", followed by a very "anglo" last name by birth, not marriage. Most people have no clue as to what my ethnic.background is. Many assume " anglo" because of my name, no accent, other than my heavy Texas draw, but I am very.dark complected.
I felt compelled to tell all of this because we are a melting pot historically. Our country is made up with more "mutts " than any place in the world. For those of you who wish to surround yourself with more of your own kind? Go to Europe, get out of my country. Try Finland.... I hear there are plenty of fair skin, blue eyed people around. Its pretty cold, dress warm. What I find hilarious about most of thesecomments, are both my families have more history in Texas than most. This includes the "non anglo" half. We are all God's creation at the end of the day. We should worry more about ourselves than the percentage of anglos to mexicans in a state which borders Mexico, and once belonged to it!