Sunday, January 30, 2011

The Global Elite Causes a Global Awakening

It's little appreciated among conservatives (in my estimation) that much of the responsibility for the overthrow of the Tunisian government and now the riots in Egypt were caused by the global elite. More specifically, the decision by Ben Bernanke of the Federal Reserve, the U.S. government, and the European Union to print money has caused a spike in commodity, including food, prices. The riots in Tunisia started as a response to those food prices and the inability of the average Tunisian to afford them. Egypt is the world's largest wheat importer. In Jordan, thousands of demonstrators called for the prime minister's resignation amid anger about "rising prices, inflation and unemployment." Take a look at a recent chart of the Continuous Commodity Index, and note that it's near an all-time high.

The constituents of the CCI can be seen here; note that food including grains, as well as energy - which also impacts food prices and increases the cost of living to the common people - make up a majority of the index. The rise of the CCI, just like the rise of global stock markets, can be directly attributed to money printing. The recipients of newly printed money largely consist of major banks, which sell their Treasury bonds to the Fed, and which in turn invest that money in assets, in this case real assets, i.e. commodities.

Zbigniew Brzezinski - remember him? - has called the recent riots and demonstrations the start of a "global political awakening", and being a fully paid-up member of the global political elite, he thinks that a bad thing.

The global elite has screwed up badly. All of their money-printing and bailouts of the politically connected has caused inflation of the basic materials which people need to live, mainly food and energy. As such, their program of developing and/or imposing an increasingly globalized government is at major risk of coming undone. The Keynesian program caused Egypt.

In the course of writing this, I came across a column by Larry Kudlow that specifically blames Ben Bernanke for the food riots in North Africa - so this isn't just my own fevered imagination.

Update: Ambrose Evans-Pritchard:
The surge in global food prices since the summer – since Ben Bernanke signalled a fresh dollar blitz, as it happens – is not the underlying cause of Arab revolt, any more than bad harvests in 1788 were the cause of the French Revolution.

Yet they are the trigger, and have set off a vicious circle. Vulnerable governments are scrambling to lock up world supplies of grain while they can. Algeria bought 800,000 tonnes of wheat last week, and Indonesia has ordered 800,000 tonnes of rice, both greatly exceeding their normal pace of purchases. Saudi Arabia, Libya, and Bangladesh, are trying to secure extra grain supplies.

The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) said its global food index has surpassed the all-time high of 2008, both in nominal and real terms. The cereals index has risen 39pc in the last year, the oil and fats index 55pc.

26 comments:

  1. The law of unintended consequences!

    However, it is funny how the anti-Sinitics among the pundits lump the Chinese and the Tiananmen incident with recent events. They clearly have no understanding of the Chinese or the genesis of the Tiananmen incident.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When money is a commodity, like gold, the increase in the amount of money is tied directly to the ability of humanity to secure nature's bounty from the earth. Fiat currency breaks this connection and encourages the over-pumping of oil fields, and the overproduction of parts of the economy that would otherwise not have been created. We have also over-produced people in response to the false signals sent by fiat money. Now, the planet is sending the bill to us. I do not know how the world gets out of this one; hopefully, some new source of energy is developed, soon, that allows the current human population to live on the planet without mass killing. Otherwise, I think the global elite will not mind fratricidal war that removes about 80% of the people on the earth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Z.B.:"To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people."

    Isn't he right about this though?

    Another question I have is this. Are you saying that the global elite is unhappy about this development. But Obama seems happy. Whose side is he on? Is he a leftist or the front man for the global elite.

    Also. Up to now I though that the interests of Islam, leftism, and Globalism have converged. Are we witnessing the divergence of these interests?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Now, the planet is sending the bill to us. I do not know how the world gets out of this one; hopefully, some new source of energy is developed, soon, that allows the current human population to live on the planet without mass killing. - ElectricAngel

    I think we should use uranium to heat water and generate steam power. Maybe, put a nice containment dome over the thing, a cooling tower with a curving, hourglass shape....

    Just an idea I dreamed up about 60 years ago.

    In all seriousness, I have often wondered if there is a chance that peak-oil, population growth, hydro dams hurting fish, etc., might dampen opposition to nuclear power. I haven't read a thing about new power plant design in decades; the new ones may be pretty good. Right?

    ReplyDelete

  5. Otherwise, I think the global elite will not mind fratricidal war that removes about 80% of the people on the earth.


    A moment's though should reveal that the global elite wishes to ensure that the correct people are punished* for the current predicament we find ourselves in.

    Unfortunately, experience teaches us that collateral damage is hard to avoid, and sometimes the elite changes completely (cf, the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution).

    *The less politically correct term is "eliminated."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Speaking of unintended consequences, it is possible that with the global elite shitting bricks over the dominoes falling in the middle east, and the knock-on effects when oil prices rise, that they will take their attention off events in South Africa ...

    ReplyDelete
  7. "To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people."

    That's an astonishingly machiavellian for Brzezinski to say. What was the purpose of that? Thinking outloud? Planting a suggestion in the minds of the Time's readership? Was this one of those ".....but that would be wrong" statements that Nixon was fond of?

    What do the global elite - and there is such a thing - really think of us hoi-polloi? Are we just peasants to them? Do they view us as we would view a bug?

    ReplyDelete
  8. But I thought the global elite is just stacked with those all important high IQ types ... ?!

    ReplyDelete
  9. What do the global elite - and there is such a thing - really think of us hoi-polloi? Are we just peasants to them? Do they view us as we would view a bug?

    I suspect that they are concerned about us much as ranchers are for livestock. We are to be "maintained" so as to be used as a source of wealth (taxes, GDP, grist for the military mill, etc.)! Ranchers I've known aren't particularly happy when a member of the herd wanders off or participates in anything disruptive like a regime toppling stampede (Helllloooo..... Egypt!)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Up to now I though that the interests of Islam, leftism, and Globalism have converged. Are we witnessing the divergence of these interests?

    The interests of Islam and Globalism/Leftism never really converged. They've collided. It has appeared as a convergence because Globalism has tried to diplomatically "manage" this encounter with Islam (along with violent military intervention in the Mideast).

    When the game is organized criminal networks transcending national boundaries, there are some natural players and Islam is one of them -- corporate criminals (i.e. globalist elites) are the main others and they've been heading for a collision with Islam.

    With corporate globalism rising at the expense of wages -- with no corresponding drop in the cost of reproduction -- and the coopting of collective barganing (AFL/CIO is a joke), Islam is in a position to do what the Unions and the Commies were never in a position to do: Conduct effective collective bargaining on a global scale with force to counter the corporate "strike busters" and international "scabs".

    One of the things that the labor movements of the 20th century taught is that effective collective bargaining elicited force and fraud from the government-corporate axis, and that unions had to be able to respond with force and fraud.

    All of this produced an environment of corrupt government and organized crime, that eventually merged to form the current regime called the United States.

    Communists said that they could organize international labor pools in a similar manner but they never really had to since immigration wasn't that much of a factor in labor disputes until after communism had been largely discredited. However, now we see that immigration is a huge factor in depressing wages below levels required for reproductively viable families, and the result is both demographic collapse and corporate imperialism.

    Islam, through its international, universalist language, decentralized command structure (union locals being replaced by mosques) is in a way better able to deliver on the rhetoric of the communists in an era where international collective bargaining and meeting organized criminal corporate action with criminal labor action is necessary.

    No, I'm not enthusiastic or supportive of Islam. But the corporate assholes will not respect the sovereignty of the countries that made them viable so they are effectively creating the situation for it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Um, hello? They view us as WORSE than a bug...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anon, 2:33 PM,

    You got the makings of a heckuvan article or book. I'd love to see you flesh out those themes.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous at 2:33, thank you for your interesting analysis. But where does it leave the left? Whose side are they on?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anon at 2:33 said:

    Communists said that they could organize international labor pools in a similar manner but they never really had to since immigration wasn't that much of a factor in labor disputes until after communism had been largely discredited. However, now we see that immigration is a huge factor in depressing wages below levels required for reproductively viable families, and the result is both demographic collapse and corporate imperialism.


    That's all very interesting but you seem to have missed the very real collusion between government and organized labor in the US ... in some ways it looks like government, corporate and labor all organized together. Now, where have we seen that triple play before? Oh yes, Germany before WWII.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Over at Belmont Club they suggested that V for Vendetta is appropriate for the moment.

    It is, indeed. Even the false messages are so similar to what the global elite wants us to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Sure, higher bread prices caused the riots in '77 in Egypt when I was living next door in Jeddah. But the second time I was involved with Egypt was with the biggest outside corporate participant in the Egyptian economy---Amoco Corporation, which provided the only real hard revenues that kept the government from penury. Amoco hardly made a dent on Egyptian policy, but anon 2:33PM has his neat little bullet points that contradict reality all set up in a tidy little network of academicide.

    The problems in Egypt are democgraphic and climate-driven, as the Sahel advances and Egypt's agricultural powerhouse, like Russia's, went from massive exporter of wheat and cotton to net importer of both---with little oil or Suez revenues to counterbalance the economic teeter-totter.

    Massive corruption and mismanagement, including vast sums on useless military equipment, have contributed to rendering a talented people like the Egyptians into a beggarly horde of subsistence survivalists. The sincle largest source of revenue for Egypt is from expats sending their wages home during teaching jobs and other skilled positions in the Arab world, where they still remain the most talented professional class.

    Egypt has a dozen reasons for its stilted political evolution, including a praetorian Army elite which literally runs the country from top to bottom. If the Army wants Mubarak or his anointed successor to remain, El Baradei and the Muslim Brotherhood will simply have to suck it up and assume the position.

    If the Army cannot hold its ranks together, then it's Katy bar the door and we're in for apocalyptic events in the near future.

    And I can think of no one worse equipped to maintain American interests in such a situation than the jug-eared schoolboy now infesting the Oval Office.

    ReplyDelete
  17. So, we have to import Mexico so we can grow the grain to feed the 3rd world? Do I have that about right?

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is what a demographic disaster look like.

    I predict:

    1. The Copts will be eliminated. They should be looking to get out of Egypt.

    2. To restore some lustre to his failing reign, His Highness, Obama will offer "humanitarian" aide, which will only postpone the inevitable, and cause knock-on effects.

    It will be interesting to see how I do in the prediction department.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I predict:

    1. The Copts will be eliminated. They should be looking to get out of Egypt.
    -----

    Israel should offer them a place to be, of course on the condition that they join the IDF. When the wars begin big time, they'll be excellent shock troops.

    ReplyDelete
  20. To echo the question Steve Sailer asked about Iraq: Is egyptian food any good? Looks like there will be a lot of new egyptian restaurants.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sadly, I've been there dozens of times and compared to incredibly delicious Lebanese and Syrian [and excellent Turkish] cuisine, Egyptian fare sucks.

    Fuul, a garlicky bean concoction is like hummus made with lima beans and is difficult to swallow, it's so yukky.

    ReplyDelete
  22. "Sadly, I've been there dozens of times and compared to incredibly delicious Lebanese and Syrian [and excellent Turkish] cuisine, Egyptian fare sucks.

    Fuul, a garlicky bean concoction is like hummus made with lima beans and is difficult to swallow, it's so yukky."

    I am surprised when people praise Lebanese food. In my opinion, it is extremely unpalatable - and I have been in a number if lebanese restaurants. I CAN'T stand any Middle Eastern food. No imagination.

    On the other hand, Turkish cuisine is an entirely different story. It is exquisite and very rich (not in the sense of greasy, but varied). This must be the heritage of the Ottoman Empire that has incorporated many influences. It brought together Middle Eastern, Mediterranean, Balkan, and even Eastern European influences in a very successful way. They even have a dessert mde of chicken.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The genesys of the riots could be about the food prices, but the ousting of ben Ali in Tunisia is linked to the World Bank and the international finance. They desidered to remove ben Ali because he blocked the opening of Tunisia to their investment and limited the economic growth of the country. In fact, ben Ali fell because the head of the military pulled his support. And now it is the military that run the show in Tunisia.
    I don't know if they foresaw the fire reaching other places like Egypt. Probably not and probably didn't bothered.

    This crisis is good, from a point of view, because with an high cost of living and many more people living in ciies, their ability to reproduce will be limited.
    If the turmoil cause the Egyptian government to fall, the economic crisys will force people to postpone marriages and childrearing. In Morocco this happenend in the '70, where because of the economic crysis the number of children fell from 3 to 2 for woman (it showed on the statistics only after 10-20 years).

    The economic crysis will hit hard Iran also. And many other places. All the governments are theetering near the collapse. They ar etrying to do the same here, with Berlusconi, but it is not working well as intended.

    ReplyDelete

Please post a civil and intelligent comment, preferably using a screen name other than "anonymous". Comments are not currently moderated and their publication does not imply the agreement of the blog's author.